Bruh i said i never did say this. Idk where did u get that from. When i asked for this “evidence” u didnt even reply lmao
U also said i played with u when i never did. Ur first actual chat response was yesterday and thats it
Thats just gaslighting others or just straight up lying 😐
It was either you or Mrbombbastic
Idk man i m just confused cuz its definitely not me bruh
Cool then lie down and die I guess, don’t try to do anything other than use your tanks as a static pillbox like the Iraqis, I’m sure that will pan out great. We call this a tactical failure if you do this.
Reminder that Bradleys, something that I would hope that people would consider to be inferior to a MBT in a normal head on engagement, succeeded in killing more armor than the M1s in the opening engagements during the gulf war, and 3BM17 has 0 issues dealing with those things, same with T-62Ms and T-55s.
That is unless you somehow think that the equivalent of 50mm of RHA is somehow enough to stop rounds from those vehicles which is laughable.
They still had mobility and optics advantage, meanwhile those Iraqi vehicles had absolutely nothing going for them.
Isn’t that because the west was far more advanced and they implemented thermals before them? Iraqis did a big mistake by buying garbage tanks.
Yes, glazing over destroying inferior equipment is kind of cringe.
Bringing something that happened decades ago is also cringe.
Still a MBT vs a IFV chassis, the firepower of all of the above was still vastly superior to the CFVs leading attacks.
However, the skill of Bradley crews in the gulf war was vastly superior to even the Republican Guard tank crews, with Bradley crews actually exploiting the weakness of T series tanks and the RG deployments to defeat them.
It turns out that when your enemy sports better optics and mobility its not optimal to just entrench and stare out into the desert.
Yes, telling that to him would be perfect.
Either way the enemies would have a big upper hand due to much better tech.
Have the new planned plane battle rankings been withdrawn? Will I no longer be able to skip clickbaits?
Then go back in time and tell them to buy west tech to have a leverage when time comes.
I think glazing over that is bit too cringe, even for a nation that hasn’t won a war in a century.
I guess everything counts.
If stating facts is glazing to you then i don’t think you belong in this forum.
I’m not arguing those aren’t the facts, only that it doesn’t really prove your stuff is good when you’re fighting seriously outdated tech.
They are not even live yet what are you smoking?
They usually do an updated BR changes list 1-2 weeks after they post the initial list, only after that do they go live.
Yesterday everything was crossed out.
strange, it’s completely fine for me.
Although earlier this morning a friend also had similar things happen in the BR changes doc. Probably either google docs being buggy or Gaijin being Gaijin I guess.
I still see it like before
