I don’t play them because they are bad, if they were good I would play them.
And I know SPAA is bad because of my hours of testing with friends in custom battles.
Glide bombs for SPAA, and Mavs for MBTs are busted.
What? Glide bombs are sht unless u have 20 and spam all of them then yes but even its funny to use all these bombs just to get 1 spaa 😐 (inefficient). When it comes to mavs they are sht (hellfire warhead is much better while being much smaller imo). Only work when they come from directly above other than they are very inconsistent and very very unreliable
No one is coming to 5km of range in top tier my dude, Strela and other IRs are useless there.
1 Like
I pretty regularly see planes within 5km, normally the longer a team has air superiority the closer they get to the battlefield
That doesn’t mean they should do that.
I know it doesnt mean people should get that close but there are planes within 5km
Russia is strong, but the best ? I disagree.
Since France got the Leos and Rafale they are defenitely not weaker, even the leclercs are pretty good and the heli is also good.
Germany very strong tanks, very good CAS and a usable heli.
USA is also strong, they just need a better SPAA.
Israel also very strong, needs a SPAA even more though.
Sweden still has the best tanks, they just lack in CAS.
Russia has essentialy it’s broken CAS and the pantsir, thats about it.
Not anymore, i’ve played countless times after the update against Germany and damn how easy it is to disable a 2A7 right now.
They’re not, but go ahead.
Aight, this proves that you don’t play Top Tier at all.
Basket nerf is a big one especially to the Leos.
And the autoloader, spall liners, K-5,Relikt, Kamovs still the best (Spikes might be better than Vikhrs in killing SPAAs but against Tanks Vikhrs are definetly better)
No, i only play 95% top tier bro.
Then explain to me how a Merkava is a very strong tank, go ahead.
Merkava 4 has good mobility, good gun and decent survibility. They are definitely not bad tanks.
In addition you get the Namer, an insane heli, a F15 and one of the F16’s.
It’s a good lineup.
Mobility, good round, less of an idler wheel weakspot compared to conventional tanks.
Probable AGM protection is a big one for the Mk4M.
The primary negative is armor being less than ideal, but that negative occurs after multiple mistakes.
What matters in Top Tier is armor, if an enemy going to shoot me from the side and i will survive that shot to return it and kill him is not like a shot that’s going to kill me or disable me super easily.
Merkavas are definetly bad tanks compared to their counterparts.
What matters in top tier is mobility and gun handling, armor is nice to have.
We can agree to disagree, but literally what matter is armor that’s why Swedish tanks are considered the BEST.
They are the best because they have everything.
While the T90 for example trades all it’s armor for the dogwater mobility.
That’s the issue, because that wouldn’t change at all but any tank you stated earlier is gimped to the max settings, so T90s having dogshit mobility is because they didn’t think to upgrade a transmission for 3 decades.
They are not.
How does that change it’s not a great tank to play in the game ?
the RU want simple compact transmission design
thats their fault
You can’t be serious, any tanks beside Russia and Sweden are totally modeled incorrectly, any armor and anything you see ingame is literally not true.