At the moment, any shot to either will take out the turret basket and engine, and that’s basically death for you. Unlike russian tanks where the autoloader eats all the spall, protects the ammo, and somehow doesn’t disable the engine either and can still shoot you with the round in the chamber.
When will we see FCS modules as well as extended turret basket modules on russian tanks gaijin?
Frontal shots to both leopards and abrams will kill the horizontal 100% of the time as well as take out the engine
Meanwhile most of the time russian autoloaders will eat it
This is a video game, what matters is if they are balanced in game
you aren’t being very convincing, how are they overperforming, same thing as before though what matters is if air is balanced and russians arent overpowered in the air
Russian favoritism 100% exists. New update came out, how long did it take them to start patching the issues with the SU-30SM? basically the very next day.
Britain get a rapier system where the missiles cost 1900 and they do no real damage but get hits. Bug reported and accepted but still absolutely no fixes yet.
Challenger 2 gun mantlet still not fixed ( no idea why they moved it in the first place ) Gaijin at the point is just an absulote joke.
So if people call it russia bias or russian favouritism its all the same as far as i’m concerned.
What are you talking about?? Do you have an issue reading or understanding?
IDGAF about russian bug reports, I care more about there been a balance and timely fixes to issues for all nations, but all I see if RU stuff been fixed straight away after this recent update and yet one of the UK’s new SPAA is utter trash, doesn’t work and after a bug report was accepted days ago there still isn’t a fix for it.
Consider the amount of hype behind the USSR jet and the rapier… there’s a lot more playing USSR than UK… Plus, they fixed the US’s new SPAA and F-18 almost immediately as a bug rolled in…
Is that US bias? Or does that not suit your agenda?
Plus, you know the devs are incredibly inconsistent. No bias here, just laziness.
Low priority. There are 50 Su-30SM players for every Rapier player. There are 50 Su-30SM payers for every Rapier one. Of course I don’t know the exact number.
And the best for multiple patches as well. That’s how it works.
People should understand that there is not actual Russian bias, there is mostly…money Bias which is what every company does. They take advantage of meta-slaves that will pay to have ^THE BEST^ and they will pay to have the next ^THE BEST^ as soon as a change happens that doesn’t favor them.
Anyone that plays MMOs for years (i’m at 20 years this year, started with L2 and DotA) can easily understand that there is no bias, just meta-shifts.
However, here we have a game based on grind and premium vehicles and accounts for income.
So if they sold big on US vehicles for say 2 patches , they will make some changes (not nerfs, possibly the other tanks/planes will receive the change later) for reasons, so the meta-player in order to not fall behind will go buy ^THE BEST^ or buy things to grind ^THE BEST^ ASAP.
To be clear, i’m not saying the meta-player is a good player by the way, it’s the player that religiously follows the meta.
And not only the meta-players do this. New players as well, they will buy a premium for the tree they ^know^ is good to grind it fast and have a good tech tree to play. Now if that changes and that tree falls behind , they’ll start playing other nations and when the grind starts being bad (over t4) they will go buy a premium for that tree.
It’s not about Bias, it’s about marketing. More player shifts from nation to nation, the more likely to sell.