GNSS don’t work on IR missiles
LOAL has to be in the game for them to change the seekers, and specifically programmable LOAL.
LOAL is currently not in the game.
IR weapons also require direct line of sight to launch in War Thunder making GNSS’s primary use case pointless.
-Oh yeah totally forgot that you have to choose the guidance mode of the Kh and the hammer in the hangar before the game…???-
SORRY MB MIXED UP MT AND ML
Can they be launched in GNSS mode without a point/track lock?
In IRL, the X-38ML is better than the X-38MT
great joke there wont
so where were the US bias threads when the F-15C went rampant in air for almost 6 months
so where are all the france bias threats for the Rafale being the single best top tier in the game for 9 months now
so why is there an unequal ammount of complaints comparing the Z-10ME and Mi-28MN they both have DIRCM but one gets complained about alot more than the other
there wont be any big complaints unless it is russia bacause that is the nation the community uses as a boogyman so they dont have to accept that they are bad at the game
are you sure?
if you think this is more information than in the brochure then iam not sure
because in the brochure the is the following information:
- range
- average speed
- max launch speed
- max launch altitude
- probability of a target hit
- missile weight
- information about servicing the missile in storage
- shelf life
while for the JAGAM MR wikipedia only says it has increased range and a tri mode seeker
no they cant
only laser guided weapons with GPS/GNSS can make use of it
?
It’s just don’t work with IR missiles. You can’t launch them via gnss because they need lock. And gnss dont work after launch so kh38 or hammer will act absolutely the same vs smoke as agm65 for example.
1 Like
Yep mb fixed my comment
I can’t say anything about the F15 but there are multiple threads about how broken the Rafale is and again neither the Rafales nor the F15s existence is in question. The rest is simply that Russia is a lot more played than china so obviously Russian stuff will be more on peoples minds.
Yeah it actually has multiple reports about actual tests (granted not on an Apache) which the MT is lacking completely
so where are the french bias claims?
russian bias was a thing in the community long before the Kh-38 was even added to the game
it has nothing to do with it
so where are the specifics i listed but for the JAGAM-MR?
all of that information is avaiable for the Kh-38
1 Like
Look in the Rafale thread or even better in the EF vs Rafale thread, at this point buffing the Rafale is a running gag (and its literally just the Rafale and nothing else french)
Yes because bias is not just „it’s the strongest“ it’s „it’s the strongest and it’s kinda questionable“ which doesn’t apply to the Rafale and the F15
True but that’s the point, what is more important, details in a brochure or actual reports that said weapon exists and was tested
look at who made that thread
again the claims from the community about russian bias existed as far back as 5 to 6 years ago
long before the Kh-38 was added to war thunder
so how are you going to get those details?
surely they know how fast their missile is by not testing it
So you made the biggest shit on Rafale superiority thread and still ask where people hate on the Rafale?
I’m not the community, I’m a firm believer that Russian bias is a new phenomenon and everything before that was just lazy modeling work („Stalinium“)
The secret ingredient is making stuff up (or taking values from similar missiles and making the rest up)
you didnt get the point
why isnt the community crying french bias like it does with russia?
that is simply wrong ppl have used russian bias as a bogeyman for years which cemented it into the war thunder community and is the reason why you are in this thread rn
so what other missile with an IR seeker does russia have to get the seeker stats from
1 Like
Yes and does L23 break the game, has it changed CAS forever has it facility to the meteoric rise of SAM systems…No so stop it.
More Biased Russia only nations with a SAM SPAA at 9.3…
Gepard is 9.7
Ozelot is 9.7
Why is the Zsu-23-4M 9.3?
wrong
3 Likes
Fair enough, you see more ZSU than these. I do think we really shouldn’t need sams to deal with CAS at 9.3 it is totally overkill and players should just learn to aim.
but that dosent change the fact that they are at 9.3 as well
i dont think so
SPAAs should be strong at every BR i dont care about cas suffering they deserve it
1 Like