Not saying you are, just that that’s what you’re after since you can’t recognize even basic imbalance in the game caused by bias. This really shouldn’t be that confusing
Oh seems to be i missed that change.
Why ? Both turret and autoloader rotate seperatley top cover of the autoloader being a module that can be damaged is already questionable now you wan’t to effect turret rotation which sounds like really special treatment not in a good way while turret bottom of the abrams contains tubes with fluid.
So they just put T series, Abrams and Leo on one level ?
2 Likes
Your most played vehicles happens to be Leopard 2, do you feel fair fighting against something the likes of challenger, ariete or vt4? In what universe they are equal?
4 Likes
When other nations are doing it it’s no biggie.
When RU is doing it it’s bias.
You need to remember that.
4 Likes
I haven’t played Germany much in recent years, which is why i have way fewer battles in VJTF and 2A7.
Got nothing better to do than stalk a man’s stats because you lost an argument?
It’s not the "top cover’ only what they are modeling with the module changes, with the coming update, as seen below.
The Drives are fed though a slip ring, in the turret race, not though the firewall into the hull, the Sump tank stores excess, low pressure fluid as a reserve (the fluid’s temperature influences the total volume so excess needs to be stored). It can additionally be isolated from the main supply in battle conditions to reduce the likelihood of a failed valve or leak / puncture from causing the working pressure to drop.
To the degree to which they can, sure. but to deliberately exclude one for no reason is strange, no? especially where they can’t actually point to sources to back up the arbitrary changes they are making.
Is the argument in the room with us now ?
2 Likes
You couldn’t read a post I made with 100 words I don’t expect you to read 10 pages of replies
Okay but what connection this makes with autoloader damage effect on turret rotation ?
Emmm no ? When devs decided to redesign missile first was tunguska and every one else later
1 Like
Because the autoloader’s Rammer is fixed in it’s alignment with the Breach (as seen in the prior linked gif above some motive elements are obviously directly affixed to the Breach, on the T-72 / T-90 reference, stub ejection mechanism may be similarly attached for the T-64 / T-80 version) and must interface with the carousel to function. If said bearing are jammed due to damage; thus how can the turret rotate independently?
Except that this is backwards, where others were first and this is catching those not yet impacted up. While omitting a key change that was made that directly conflicts with their stated goals for the basis underpinning the intent of the change(s) made.
it’s not like they decided to not have said changes impact the ADATS because ??? (e.g. the MIM-146 is an ATGM, not a SAM). Also it’s been more than one update since the changes went live, and prior to that more than a year where they were publicly acknowledged as part of the 2024 roadmap.
You persistence on building strawman is something to see.
1 Like
Your ability to similarly dodge answering basic questions is just as impressive.
No seriously how many times you just replaced some ones thesis ?
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
And please, only respond if you can actually formulate an argument, or explanation. Not just hurl invectives into the void.
It’s hardly on topic, is it.
Lmao. Just because you try to look up extravagant words in a dictionary doesn’t mean you know how to use them.
Since you won’t rewrite what you put, I’ll note it as void and null.
1 Like
Have you ever stopped and considered, that others might have a wider grasp on the English language than you do? Besides, these scary “big words” tend to convey, both an explicit modality and context far better than I could do otherwise.
Besides it’s not a dictionary that would be useful, it would be a thesaurus for your accused case since I’d need to know a word exists (and how to spell it) to find it in a dictionary.
Also my use of grammar is trash, I know this. I’d never get it past the copy editor.
So you agree you have poor grammar, but try school me saying my reading comprehension is terrible? Oh okay lol
1 Like
Ka-52 was made immune to IR missiles in 2023, it was never Russian bias.
IR AA is the least popular SPAA at top BR since 2019.
Mig-29 has the worst flight performance of any jet in game relative to what it should be.
There are zero bugs that benefit Russia, for one Russia doesn’t even exist in War Thunder, and there are zero bugs that benefit Soviets.
ERA is not over-performing in War Thunder at all. Relikt is 54mm against APFSDS when flat. Kontakt 1 is the worst ERA in the game.
IFVs are chronically average.
The fact your post implies AIM-9X is incorrect from your wrong CS5 statement is wild.
Pantsir is still bad against top CAS.
@tensilaspider Ka-50 is a higher BR than NATO equivalents. Rooivalk is the same BR as Ka-50 despite being notably superior in weapons, optics, and agility.
2S38 was already uptiered.
Kh-38 planes are not at 2S38’s BR, thus it’s not a useful way to spawn those.
The 2S25M is vastly superior to 2S38, especially for CAS getting. And obviously all 10.3 MBTs are superior to 2S38.
4 Likes
No it wasn’t made immune. LAV-ADs still hit me all the time, even with the MAW going and moving.
1 Like