Well, you don’t seem to be bright enough to realise i was obviously talking about ground battles. But the XP-50 no longer gets airspawns, the XP-55 isn’t that great, the A-10 is just as busted as the Su-25s and i avoid high tier air because it’s just a boring missile fest.
you think the M8LAC is broken?
M22 is not broken at all, it’s armament sucks and it can be .50.
M4 105 isn’t broken, all it has is a high HEAT pen. the post pen damage is garbage, the ballistics terrible and the reload long. it’s only strong in a downtier.
the M4A1 is below average in strength. it’s armour is awful, it’s mobility sub-par and it’s armament mediocre.
T-18e2 is super rare, not a premium and isn’t that strong. it’s biggest strength is that people don’t know what it is.
the t14 is great in a downtier, but it’s armament is awful and it has it’s big hull MG weakspot for anyone that knows what they’re doing and doesn’t get fucked by desync.
the t55e1 is bad, it can be killed by and MG, it’s gun handling and firing ark are shit and the gun itself isn’t that special at 4.3.
the t-29 has a long reload and will face tiger 2s every match, which are far better than it and a lower BR.
the T26e5 is great in a downtier, it’s weakspots are poorly defined. but it’s armament is really bad, it can’t pen tiger 2s from the front despite being the same BR. honestly, the E1-1 is better.
the T114 isn’t good. it has no armour, it’s not fast and it has poor gun handling and it’s only good round is HEAT which sucks.
the MBT70 is german, not american. along with the XM803, their rounds aren’t great, thier armour can be a bit trolly but isn’t great overall. really the main strength is it’s acceleration, but their top speed isn’t great.
The M1A1s aren’t anything special, the armour is still way worse than it should be. mostly they’re just a bit faster than their contemporaries with less protection.
Not sure what you’re talking about with the “P49/39” perhaps a wrong name.
the XP-55 is kind of niche onnly really being able to powerfight and without ordenance and is also rare.
the XP-50 is pretty average now without it’s airspawn.
IMO the F4Us are below average fighters and CAS compared to their contemporaries. they handle like ass, .50s are pretty shitty armaments. the only really good one is the AU-1, which gets cannons and loads of bombs.
the A-1H, like the AM-1 and AD series are decent cas, but are slow and handle poorly. you’re much better off taking out an F8F, which is far strong than any of your attempt at pointing out broken vehicles.
the F-89’s have insane climb, but their handling isn’t great. the rocket one can be a bit of a meme. it’s main claim to fame was being the same BR as the Su-11 but being much worse before they upped the Su-11.
The F86’s are not op at all. their handling isn’t anything special, their armament sucks, either being .50s or 20mm with almost no ammo. they’re very mediocre. the CL-13 B Mk.6 is the best version, but still suffers from the shit armament.
I don’t get what you’re trying to do. you start out like you’re presenting a list of OP vehicles, but none of the vehicles you list are OP.
Oh wow, how clever of you. Yes, i do well, that has no bearinng on how incredibly biased gaijin are to USSR vehicles or how horrendous they are at balancing. i haven’t really used the t-34-57 for years, it used to be my daily grind for a long time, br changes fucked the lineup and i got bored with it moved on to other nations as i had also finished the USSR tree.
