Might be plain wrong, but is it possible that matchmaking depends on BR? Also, Germany doesn’t always get paired with Russia but they do get paired with them much more times than with, for example, US.
That is down to the altitudes the game makes you fight. Make that Yak climb and your 109/190 will defeat it easilly. Try and fly low down and the Yaks excel and will send you back to the hanger.
1 Like
you know this a game right? and we have a br system just so vehicles perform rater equally. very good vehicle high br very bad vehicle lower br even if both vehicles are from the same type and period
see most Russian and German vehicles compared to Swedish
the Pvkv IV is a post war vehicle so 6.7+ but it sucks even at 3.0
I had a stroke reading this. I, for one, like how you completely missed my point.
What?
Again, what? Is having a 30mm cannon unrealistic? I think you have a skill issue.
Again, I can’t read 60% of this. So now its bias because of historical accuracy… right…
yes, going through tracks is fine. You don’t see me complaining when a round of any type pens my tracks and goes through my side armour. Soviet APHE has good angle performance…
They used blunt nosed AP with a ballistic cap, IIRC same as the M103’s 120mm round, which offers better performance against angled armour while keeping the shell aerodynamic.
Other nations used sharp nosed rounds with AP caps and ballistic caps, the first cap was to help prevent rounds shattering on impact (have a look at the shatter gap), the second to improve aerodynamic performance of the round.
So, again, does this ‘preferential treatment’ apply to the US? They get .50 cal before any other nation, and a stabiliser before any other nation as well. They got like 6 new jets last update. They dominated the skies before the KH-38 and Su-34.
Does it apply to Germany? They get thermals before anyone else and have the best tanks at toptier. They also have severely under br’d tanks at lower tiers.
Does it apply to France? They get 200mm pen 6s autoloader tanks at relatively low BR’s.
Does it apply to japan? They get a 4s reload at ~11.0 be. They also get the best plane at its BR (The Zero)
Does it apply to the UK? They get ATGM’s at 6.3. They also get 200+ mm pen solid shot/APDS at low BR’s too.
Does it apply to sweden? They get a 3.2s reload HE slinger facing 1940’s tanks. They get an impenetrable cheese wedge that could face 1940’s tanks that couldn’t pen it (its now moved up), whilst its 250mm+ apds + 4.2s reload made short work of them. They have the best tanks at toptier too.
Your post have nothing to do with mine. Literally nothing. I guess you’ve made a mistake and wanted to answer to someone else.
Yes, i like how 1960-1970 vehicles in swedish tech tree are on 2.3 BR and fights pre war/early war tanks.
funny thing is, that all zeros are very overBRed
“If something was designed to be very effective, and then it is very effective in game, that means it performs like it was designed to do - its not overperforming in game.”
if something was very effective in RL it will be BR nerfed ingame
just ask the tiger 1
Your best performing vehicles are literally either US and German for ground and American and German and Swedish jets for air. If there’s ‘favouratism’, then why aren’t you winning more matches in Russian and Chinese vehicles?
That is not the point.
Source: Trust me bro
1 Like
lmao
Go check out the Shvag 7.62 mm yes have the higher RPM except the Vulcan
30mm have APHE again , and lazer Stalinium Velocity
Historical accuracy on Books no soldier from CCCP will sit and make belts like this and because Gaijin use manuals to make the game so called accurate is complete … Cermet Core AP have the higher Pen in MG on tanks
Ask Veterans from T-34 for BR-365 ammo angles of pen unrealistic aside of that you have the idiotic Nuke spalling again unrealistic APHE don’t do that
US ammo is at least 30% less pen that historically they can do that in game
France Autoladers have 0 armor + got ammo rack first hit at turret again relatively Low BR you referring to FL10 that not have armor is upiered as hell no reverse and AP yes AP seems you have skill issue
UK ATGMS another you kidding right Rater is like Maus with no armor + you can kill it with MG
Jap 4 sec reload not only Jap get them you don’t say nothing about RUS obj 906 and another magical 2S25 and 2S38
Sweden get HE slinger at 3.7 so what Sav m/43 have 250 pen HEAT at 3.0 and no one cry about it this same go for PT-76-57 t34-SMT , KV-1E,2S38 PT76B with Heat-FS and China have APDSFS and list go on
Oh wow
I’ve never seen anybody have such skill issue and be so sensitive about it, that claims he “purposefully throw matches in ru tanks”.
I’ve had suspicious, but now i am sure about his employment in circus staff.
3 Likes
another beleaver in the post WW2 mythology about the Tiger 1…
Where can i get 2S25 with 4 sec reload ? I am missing that in my lineup.
The rest of your post i honestly have trouble understanding, but i have the feeling i didn’t miss out on much.
1 Like
The thing is that the tiger 1 is at a perfectly fine br
The problem is that most off the ppl playing it don’t understand the concept of angeling it
2 Likes
Gaijin incorrectly thought AGM-65D/G weren’t OP and thought adding more IR AGMs would result in balance.
@HOMINUSNOCTURNO-live
There is no world where artificially nerfed AGM-114Ls are just copy-paste AGM-114Ks, or blatantly OP.
Especially when AH-64E can use AGM-179 and SPIKE missiles.
@_Ladies_Man_217
Zero bug reports have been accepted from YouTube videos.
@YungSky
Those manpad reports include a dozen “western” sources.
There is conflicting data with Stingers.
@Xx8xX
30 - 45mm guns are not laser accurate on any aircraft.
And they’re about as easy to use as just dive bombing.
Also APHE/APCBC angled pen performing the way it does is why USA, Germany, Japan, China, Soviets, etc are strong.
There was a vote to make APHE more realistic but the community said no.
Also the fact your post claims APHE has less pen than it should have after claiming it has more is hilarious.
1 Like
You two don’t make sense hard to understand and again and again claiming APHE is APCBC the difference is Huge in game because two of you have not much a … i will try explaining it with Baby steps
Germans use Armor Piercing Capped Ballistic Capped munitions with a High Explosive bursting charge
Russia APHE at the beginning was sharp nosed and had the unfortunate tendency to Shatter at impact so they chance it to APHEBC to prevent shattering in WT no such think exist with Rus Ammo
Lets go back for a moment to 75mm KwK 42 Long Panther Gun using APCBC with 28.9 grams explosive meaning is game behave purely because of this 29g no post penetration DMG remember that was one of the most powerful Anti Tanks guns in WWII
Going back to Rus Bias APHE behaving like a Nuke with post penetration dmg is the explosive that they have making Reality obselite ALVISWISLA babling about Name with 0 research only Name Stuck
So knowing well what is meaning of
APCBC
APHE
APHEBC
"Also the fact your post claims APHE has less pen than it should have after claiming it has more is hilarious.’ The only Hilarious you are here
In a game like this some thinks like this should be fixed how Sabot is shattering but aphe even if not penetrate yellow your Crew
APHE is even used in Planes and Jets and yes they are Lazer Accurate
Obviously such things don’t exist in a game, how would you want to balance this ?
1 Like
@Xx8xX
You replied to the wrong user.
Unlike you, I know about APHE and HE-filled APCBC.
The fact your post calls APHE and APCBC “Russian bias” despite neither being Russian makes it obvious your post is speaking without knowledge.
And you have the audacity to look down on others that know more than you; All your posts do is insult others.
1 Like