Yes but they dont perform IRL like in the Game its straight Russian Cope. They dont have the capability to be FNF and hit moving targets but here we are.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Can we stay on topic and debate the question not the person if you want to have a more heated debate move it to DM’s within the guidelines OFC.
sorry, but when someone repeatedly insults people, is extremely toxic, abusive and generally a massive pain in the rear, they deserve to be made fun of by the whole forum.
this whole reddit civility nonsense is futile for people like him.
who
You may feel that way but the Guidelines say differently, So if someone is Insulting you Flag them and it will be dealt with.
4 Likes
I think the entire bias thing (specifically for tanks in this case) comes down to learning curve. This is purely my opinion, but I believe Russian MBTs are more new player friendly short term, especially for premium players. You have a lot of active advantages that other tanks don’t have. Something like the Abrams, which requires more skill to play effectively, is much less player friendly short term (Click bait is a great example of how bad new players are at using it). Russia also gets a lot of premium options at top tier and too many vehicles for lineups. One of the more prominent bias “features” comes down to how ERA is modeled. IRL they don’t just have a set KE protection value, as it depends on the angle it’s struck, the projectile, etc. Gaijin currently cannot model realistic ERA so they slap some numerical values on it and call it a day. If for example the BVM did not have any ERA, it would be lolpenned by most top tier rounds with greater than 550mm of pen through the UFP. I’m a US main and after playing both early Russian MBTs and of course the Abrams, the Abrams is better by miles, but it took time to learn how to play it.
2 Likes
agree
And to add to this the KH38MLs have been used extensively and are real. The MTs are Bullshit Russian Bias lol especially since we cant even get Artificially nerfed AGM114Ls
3 Likes
ML would be perfectly balanced in the game, its speed would compensate for the fact that it needs to be led by laser, it would be no worse than Hellfires. MT is a blatant imbalance. What were Gaijin thinking?
1 Like
so we will ignore how gaijin said that they will never use russian sources to balance Nato vehicles (and other way around), but denied the Western Manpads their real G-Overload which is documented and accessible to the public, just because the russian ilga couldnt have more max gs
3 Likes
yeah right and thats very helpful in russian imaginary missile spam in 13.0 grb
I guess we’ll also ignore the tons of nerfs done to Russian vehicles and deny bug reports that would buff them too.
& the bug reports that been accepted and implemented from a Youtube video as a source.
1 Like
Such as?
yeah idc what people say I have seen Russian Bias a lot and it is real
2 Likes
I saw aliens in my room too, idc what the doctors say ive seen them a lot and they are real.
3 Likes
definetly a thing just look at there props YAK-1 3 7 9 are all very op Yak-9U being most op so far at 4.7 they outperform pretty much every other prop at the BR with very little effort
Is it American Bias because the US gets .50 cals in their planes 3-4 BR’s before any other nation?
Is it American Bias cos they get .50 cals on their ground vehicles like 5-6 BR’s before anyone else gets an equivalent HMG?