You won’t believ what I shot the first 20 darts into… after that I got confused as to why he is still doing great and shot first even lower (missing him) and then higher
Pz4H is also under-BR’d.
3 Likes
I appreaciate you trying to help me
But I did exactly that and it didn’t work
Doesn’t help that the PUMA has the spread of a shotgun either… most shots hit “somewhere” but not where you are aiming at
Ofcourse it works in the training ground… don’t want everybody to be able to prove easily that the tanks sometimes just ignore shots
Lets put every tank 5 BR’s higher except for the udssr ones and see how fun it is if every match is udssr vs udssr
The Russian bias people are talking about:
Yes, half a dozen photographs are shown.
Oh, and before anyone makes false-accusations against me. I’m going for the Mi-8AMTSh cause it’s more interesting than the Mi-28s.
I also don’t have the American tech tree Apaches for the same reason.
He is right, it should be 4.0 alongside the M4A2 and the T-34 (1942).
Also, what does udssr mean?
Yeah probably correct
But there are a lot of tanks that should go up or down…
My bad… where I come from its called udssr and not ussr…
1 Like
Typical childish, under 18 response, and you wonder why adults won’t allow kids to vote. You are too imature and irrisponsible. Don’t bother even TRYING to work out my gameplay by looking at my stats. They mean absolutely jack shit. You have no idea how I play. I am quite happy and more than willing to take one for the team if it means we WIN. People who like to call “skill issue” do so because they have no concept what so ever of what TEAMWORK means. I am a team player, not a child that thinks K/D ratio is the be all and end all of everything.
I don’t give a shit about k/d. I play the objective. You will NEVER find me sitting back pot shotting like a noob who is too scared to come out from under the rock they found and crawled under.
1 Like
I have been 1-3 shotting them with the fox.
Except what you reported has nothing to do with K/D or teamwork, it’s you apparently failing to kill a tracked and barreled unnamed russian medium in a King Tiger. That is a pretty bad skill issue.
4 Likes
Rich coming from the guy who thinks Russian bias is real…
2 Likes
Same i just finished researching all the modules on the freccia and a short burst there and they blow, from my experience they gave me on average less troubles to kill than the leo 2 or abrams with the autocanon and specially with the spikes.
I much prefer fighting russian mbts because they seem to be easier to oneshot. Hit the lower center mass and they go pop.
Leos seem to absorb shots more often.
I didn’t even look at your stats, your explanation of what happened was enough.
M4A2
OMG, this is the worst troll I’ve ever seen in my life.
1 Like
First one is correct at lower BRs, and top tier.
There is some irony in the 2nd one.
What’s wrong with the M4A2?
Please be parody
T26E5 is the best heavy tank I’ve used at 6.7. Soviet guns have troubles with it rather above its BR.
Agreed. I’d rate it higher than the Tiger II H just due to its survivability against the soviet 122mm, and its overall better armour protection.
Just because average Russians main fail to make it work doesn’t mean it wasn’t there
If not then why gaijin don’t try make western tanks close to real life performance and can access the advanced armament? It obvious that Gaijin know if they do that
Russia don’t have a god damn chance they are too scared so instead we stuck with 90+ version of Maverick for the west while Russia have 2012 ATGM (where Brimstone?)
DM53 and L27A1 lack anti ERA gaijin are too scared to add because there only one nation will be fall victim to it the most so they decided to make it not work like it supposed to.
Because western older tech better than Russians tech? well it not western fault that they better making stuff than Russia.
2 Likes