Russian Autoloader buff is ridiculous

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
131

I tried to make an example on why there is obviously a lot of movement in a Tseries tank. They not really known for comfort while driving. Let me ask you this. What tank would you rather ride in for comfort, Leopard 2a7v or T80BVM. I was trying to make a point that the Autoloader is probably put under stress while driving because there is obviously movement in the Tank while driving like in every Tank.

We are arguing one side should NOT be effect by inertia and stress and the other side should just accept the fact that we get nerfed because a humans have to endure inertia while loading a gun. Doesn’t make much sense to me but I guess we just ignore:

Vertical shocks
From bumps, ruts, jumps, ditch crossings
These cause can momentary unload/load cycles on gears, bearings, and guides

Longitudinal inertia (braking/acceleration)
Sudden braking pushes ammo and carousel components forward
Sudden acceleration pulls them rearward

Lateral forces (turning, side slopes)
Causes sideways loading on carousel guides and rammers

Suspension movement = gun stabilization works harder
Gun movement = Autoloader timing tolerances tighten
Rough motion = crew and system both compensate

1 Like
132

Meanwhile the Leo is now the slowest reloading vehicle, before the crew hits Ace status.

1 Like
133

ZTZ99A / VT4A1 exist

2 Likes
134

I think the weak part here sits between the chair and the monitor.

6 Likes
135

fr dude lol

1 Like
136

Yeah, just like we can accept the fact “other side” breaks the rules of physics by allowing gunner to keep doing his gunner duties while reloading at the same time from his gunner spot. Otherwise manually loaded tanks with 2 crew left should be reloading in like 30 seconds.

4 Likes
137

What better armor? Anywhere without era can be penned by any dart with over 500mm of pen reguadless of angle, the t90m can upf by 105mm from m1128, the only upside of bothering with russian tanks is smaller profile which is pointless because of no depression to even use it.
Also im not sitting back with no point caps because most russia team mates are prem players who bought their way up, instantly died because everyone tells them that they are op and have the best armor, and now they’re either out of the game or forced to run a stock tank that gaijin thought would be worthwhile to add.

138

Breaks the rules of physic? What are you talking about? We have plenty of penalties in game that somewhat simulate your crew being hit. Replacement is a thing and if the gunner has to load your reload is literally slower…

1 Like
139

real bro

140

its only this bad when anything Russian gets a buff :(

141

?

got a weak round that cant pen anything from the front

Neither can other IFVs but this one can easily disable you, and has 4 ATGMs that CAN pen you.

typical T-series weak spot.

Ah yes, when 10% of the front is a “weak point”. Broski you’re not even trying atp. Your bias is seeping thru, then again you have the BMPT lmao.

1 Like
142

aren’t you that guy with the skill issue large enough that you thought 9ms on the f-18 at 12.7 would have been balanced?

143

whataboutism

1 Like
144

dude has too many issues between the ears to make coherent arguments

2 Likes
145

ALSO HES JUST LYING MAN nato tanks are great compared to Russian ones in the things that actually matter. Mobility, gun handling, and survivability

2 Likes
148

I agree, but survivability is a joke nowadays. Back when the first M1 was released sure, but now? Nothing is easier than one shooting an Abrams.
The only thing that offers survivability is the carousel autoloaders and magic bags of T90/80bvm.

149

You’ve never looked at the penatration map on a T series vs. Nato tanks have you?

Lots of green for russian shells to pen any whete vs. Very specific spots on the russian tanks.

151

So as Japan, Germany, USA…

152

Too bad the OP got flagged by forum shitheads.

153

maybe I’m just bad but leo2s eat a lot more of my rounds frontally than t-72/80/90 do