Russia needs more stuff at 12.0

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
29

bmpt terminator might be more 10.0-10.7 material

30

Personally, I wouldn’t put it that low. Comparing it to Puma vjtf, the bmpt is more armored and has better choice of weapons. Somewhere 11.0 is good

1 Like
31

no >:(

32

I don’t know much about it so I assumed it could be an equivalent of the puma, at 11.0 can be useful as a backup for the T-90a which is currently the only lonely 11.0 :(

1 Like
33

yes -_-

34

aww :(

35

Heard that tor-m1 might be coming to USSR tree so another 11.0 vehicle, possibly

36

I hope they skip it for the TOR-M2

1 Like
37

I think I can safely say we brits and french would trade all of our top tier for something as favourably modelled as a russian MBT

play top tier with challenger 2/3 or with leclerc and you wont be whining so much

4 Likes
38

yeah you’re right, 4 leclercs with 5 seconds autoloader and 2 leopards, and you cry for some -4 reverse T-90m?
See you’re the one whining here
Besides i play all nations so I’m not biased towards one in particular, I have France grinded till the amx 40 currently

39

Wouldn’t that be basically a hq17? Or are they different?

40

Russia doesn’t need anything.

2 Likes
41

what are you talking about only germany, france and sweden have more 12.0 ground vehicles while china and isreal have the same number

that still puts russia as having more 12.0 ground than average

1 Like
42

Japan if you will, Italy has more vehicles to offer in the end-of-the-line battle ratings.

43

For now.

44

Russia can get completely ignored for the next 6-8 months and they’ll be just fine.

45

So can america and germany but i bet if that was said you would be saying other wise.

4 Likes
46

They’re dramatically different, the TOR-M2 gets the 9M338 and instead of eight ready fire missiles it can carry sixteen ready fire missiles that have 16km range that can hit 1,000m/s, I think they also hit greater G tolerances, its radar is much more improved and can fire on the move.

48

O_o definitely not 11.0 material

49

Britain onward I agree with you but thanks for proving my point. Also FYI RU at the top end is in dire need of support vehicles (ATGM carriers and light tanks specifically) and there are options for that but you probably don’t want to hear that as it goes against the Russian bias narrative you like to push in literally every thread I see you in.

1 Like