Russia Mbts completely destroyed by anything else

All spoken like someone who has never played top tier, but you have proven that time and time again already.

3 Likes

lol no 3TD are worse than 90M maybe even worse than 2E

1 Like

ouch full skill no expert leo needs 6.98, and needs a 80% loader lv to make it near 7.1
Grinded the tree to l2a5 with no prem and barely reached it

So go and purchase the Expert qualification then?

2 Likes

Then what is it doing at the same BR as the 2A7V?
Or even worse: what is the Leopard 2A5 still doing at the same BR?

Both the Leopard 2A5 and 2A6 were already 11.7 before the 2A7V got added, this has nothing to do with the 2A5 and 2A6 being over-tiered, instead this is just a case of Gaijin not extending the top BR’s when implementing a wave of better MBT’s.

  • Challenger 2E is just a better Challenger 3TD at the same BR.
  • T-80U-E1 is just a better T-80U at the same BR.
  • T-80UD is just a better T-72B at the same BR.
  • M1A1 is just a better IPM1 at the same BR.

This happens all the time.

4 Likes

Cost too much sl… still 5msl of vehicles waiting for me to buy
Never paid gaijin a cent lol

BR compression. No tanks currently in game should be at the same BR as the 2A7Vs and Strv 122s. These tanks are just too good.

proceeds to “equalize” a t-80 whermst driving a m3a3

To be fair it’s also like this the other way around.

I don’t agree that the BVM and 90M are these overpowered MBTs that everyone makes them out to be (that title goes to the Strv 122s/2A7s), hell I think the BVM is decently asymmetrically balanced with the M1A2 SEPv1, however these tanks are still pretty easy to do well in.

1 Like

A lot seem to dislike that this is the truth

2 Likes

No tanks in the game able to go toe to toe with them in the environment that Gaijin want us to play (city CQC) except Strv122 and 2A7V when other side need to aim some weaks spot but other just aim any direction of the hull
That being say
Strv122/2A7V fighting against T-80BVM/90M are more balance (because both side gonna need to aim weakspots) than
Abrams Leclerc Challenger fighting against T-80BVM/90M (when other need to aim other not)
since 122 and 2A7 got some frontal armor other is not

The 2A7s/Strv 122s fighting anything except themselfs currently is just not balanced lol.

Maybe it’s just because I’ve had the Sweden map as my perma ban for the last 4ish years or I’m just getting lucky, but I really don’t get too many maps that are exclusively CQB. So I would personally take my M1A2 SEP over my BVM any day of the week due to playstyle.

Does that mean I think that the SEP is better than the BVM? no, but at the same time I also don’t think it’s really worse.

It depend really some situation Abrams might be better than BVM (but if have to fight Russia at CQC i’ll picked 122)but most of the city which i see most of the times when playing top tier even i press “Dont like” i gonna need some level of frontal against them
(I don’t see Fulda for three weak despite i “liked” it)

LMAO what

Bottom left gun breach is a 1HK usually

My dude the first part is just simple math. Even with an Abrams’ reverse speed, how often would the at best 2.1 seconds of time given by the reload allow you to get behind cover enough to not be shot anyways?

As for the second part, how (beyond the one way already pointed out to be a dubious benefit at best) are the 11.3/11.7 better than the T-80BVM or T-90M?

You mean 6.5/7.1 seconds right? The 2.1 seconds is the time you have to fire again without the Russian tank being able to fire back. Not the reload.

1 Like

I mean if the T-90M is shot by an Ace-crewed Abrams and tries to reverse versus a T-90M is shot by a T-72 of another nation, but yeah that’s why I said it’s the best case scenario for the Abrams.

As in, would any of these outcomes be different in the majority of cases:

  • 5.00 second reload against T-90M reverse
  • 5.00 second reload against Abrams reverse
  • 7.10 second reload against T-90M reverse
  • 7.10 second reload against Abrams reverse

I get away with my life quite often because of that faster reload.

Better firepower, allround mobility and gun depression angles are absolutely massive. You just don’t recognize that.

Let’s be honest, you are just another below average player that watched a couple top tier videos, completely misinterpreted half the info given and now you think you know how top tier works.

A perfect example is one of your recent claims in another topic. You likely saw in a video how the TUSK shields on the Abrams are a HE one shot trap. However you somehow interpreted that in such a way that you made the claim that the .50 cal in general of all Abramses is a HE shot trap, which is just straight up false and shows your inexperience.

3 Likes