Technically yes when you are already one of the worst and everything stronger than you receives further buff. That’s why we need 12.3 for ground vehicles
Yeah according to you almost entire hull are green except UFP right?
so what your problem?
unless when you see Leopard you aimlessly at hull and got pissed because you can’t pen it?
And Strv122 also has just 9mm more penetration than Russia so it must be worse shell in the game too according to you
Credit @SPANISH_AVENGER
9 Likes
so lemme get this straight the weakspots that are there cuz its part of the russian design should be eliminated so its fair for you or what’s your suggestion?
damn, and all I want on the tank I play is proper weak spots
So 2A7,B+,T90M,T80BVM can receive unpenetrable hull, but when it comes to the Abrams Nuh uh it would make it stronger than the Ariete? What kind of hipocrisy is this.
12.7, I would even say, AT MINIMUM!
I will share again my idea of proper decompression;
1 Like
Something something strawman
ngl, my only nitpicks on that list are that not all nations get the highest br, and that Merkava Mk.4s don’t compare well to the other tanks in the given br (in their current state, that is)
Other then that, I like it
Hahahah, I still remember when I made that- it was 2020, back when Strv 122A was still limited to DM33!
The UFP was also bugged and was lolpennable most of the times, hence why it’s green here- if I made the picture nowadays, it would be deep orange or even red, except for the driver hatch.
Regardless, its point still stands!
I think, ideally, in Top Tier, everyone should have relevant armor, strong enough to warrant the need to aim for weakspots.
That’s why I don’t understand why, some people, will tell you to “just aim for weakspots” regarding their strong tanks, but then, they get mad at the idea of having to aim for weakspots as well, just like others need to do against them. That’s just balance!
1 Like
well that’s the thing if the weakspot its caused by the design of the tank there is not much we can do unless u got into the fictiional it would be a very unfair artificial buff unlike some tanks wich actually needed an artifical buff that wasnt as severe as adding a completely unexistant piece of armor
fair… T’is unfortunate, but what I shall endure. Gives me the opportunity to continue learning how to play the game without armour though, so thats a plus
For the sake of balance, T-90M should have that impenetrable hull you are talking about because it reverse 34khp slower than Abrams, it’s also unfair that it reload 2 seconds slower than Abrams, this is unacceptable bro. I hope the next update they give the T-90M that impenetrable hull, base on my experience I couldn’t afford to risk taking a hit, because 90% of the time I get shot its a critical hit which is damn annoying.
Remember the disclaimer at the top! This list would be including armor fixes; in Merkava Mk.4’s case, around 550mm KE on the hull and 700mm KE on the turret.
Regarding not all nations getting the highest BR, those would come as new additions! Here’s a more comprehensive list I made including potential new additions to fill those spots, plus even more decompression:
1 Like
You might be a troll but i’m gonna say this, Abrams combined with its real armor and the real thickness of its turret ring, it would easily stomp T90M anyday now and that goes for every NATO tank that’s still suffer from the bad modelling that DEVS did and still do, but now most nations are vulnerable when it comes to armor for the sake of crying Russian mains to play this fairytale and believe that their tanks are something while they’re nothing.
Must spend double SL for just a 1.8 second difference, with a lvl 150 crew it’s only a 1.35 second difference.
“The M1A2 is better because he didn’t kill on the first shot (because the armor of in-game soviet tanks is much better than virtually all other tanks at top tier) and you didn’t knock out the loader (a big if, especially due to how massive the Abrams’ weakspots in-game are) he can fire at you before you reverse (even though in the majority of scenarios an extra second or two would not get you fully behind cover).”
i mean in my experience T series are incredibly well armored even early T-72 A altough can be pen’d very easily its pretty nice
this post is definition of skill issue
2 Likes
You don’t need Level 150 for max reload and leadership
1 Like
It’s already stomping the T-90M I don’t know what you are talking about bro, I’m struggling to maintain 2.0 KDR because the mobility is so bad that breech/barrel damage often guaranteed death, and 7.1 second reload also makes me lose the opportunities to score some kills because I couldn’t reload on time. Imagine that if Abrams (which is already stronger on the hands of someone who isn’t a smooth brain) receives further buff, my already dogshit T-90M kdr will drop to negative.
Oh btw since I don’t even play Abrams, why should I care about it? similar like players who don’t even touch USSR, why should they care if the vehicles struggle lol not like they going to deal with that S
Have you looked at your own record. lmao