Yes: link
4 Likes
Good to know
1 Like
You should rereport that on the new side when you got the time.
2 Likes
I have been working on something similar
I basically like this in game rn but the missile mesh isnt done yet so I used SS.11 as placeholder
11 Likes
you already have the fuel tanks modelled
wanna try to model the belly mounted RATO booster too?
it could simply be attached afaik
old forum talked about it but im specifically talking about the belly pack (not the exposed double boosters)
like in these images
3 Likes
I am already two steps ahead
2 Likes
2 Likes
however I am not sure if i wanna make the belly back as that was never built and is part of the C-3 variant maybe in the future when I make other 262 variants I can make it but not for my B variant
1 Like
actually remmeber seeing a good few images of it, it did exist but for the life of me i cant seem to find it
EDIT:
3 Likes
I see
2 Likes
afterburner when ???
1 Like
1 Like
You should post it in the Me 262 topic :3
3 Likes
Best part about that is that the F-80 F-84 people always cry that the 262 is OP I am like what how? They accelerate better climb better turn better They are literally better in any regard to the 262
2 Likes
Trying to use my X-4 against an enemy F-80 but it goes right past him and doesn’t explode because its specifically tuned to the engine of the B-17
1 Like
You know that isn’t actually an afterburner right??
Gotta check these days…
That particular engine probably has less than 10 minutes of existence left when that video was taken…
1 Like
maybe its tuned to the amplitude more than the frequency?
i doubt they could manage such precise acoustic channels
its the closest i could find to a video of the jumo 004E engine model with afterburner
Not a video, not a Jumo 004, not on a 262… maybe not even an afterburner either!! :)
me 262 hg1 and hg2 where planned to have addtions of this engine but war ended before it could happen