ATGM loadouts are very different from rocket loadouts.
If you knew so much about WW2 then you would know the big mistake for Warthunder is the amount of ammo the roof mounted MG has.Most UK gunners had only around 300 rounds for the roof mounted 50 cal on the Sherman.The roof mounted MGs also snagged on cables and wires and raised the profile of the already tall tank.So they took them off.The Americans saw it a different way,had plenty of ammo.Every nation and unit is different so it’s a badly made point and one you are clearly struggling to defend.
Again. I am talking about roket loadouts. AS IS THE VERY THING I STATED IN THE NEXT LINE.
Can you stop misquoting me? This is a breach of forum rules what you are doing.
You get lit the fuck up by several heavy machine guns and then you die. Simple as.
There is proof that has been provided that literally contradicts that statement that has been provided in this thread. You have provided zero evidence that roof mounted mgs in warthunder turn faster than irl. Your entire argument is based on emotions.
Exactly my point.
Rooftop machine guns in their present state are too strong and do not reflect real world performance.
Based on what evidence
His words not mine.
No. This is a helicopter pilot problem. You shouldn’t be charging several tanks which you KNOW have the capability to kill you in short fashion.
You made the thread
All ground vehicles have the ability to engage helicopters.
But I don’t care about your Helicopter as I don’t play past 7BR so leave the game as it is.A Taliban Toyota pickup truck with an MG on the back will shoot down an unarmoured helicopter.Get an armoured one.
Yes I believe they are too strong.
Based on what evidence??
Hardly, as nerfing their turret rotation speed by any appreciable amount would affect their ability against all CAS, not just helicopters. In fact, it would hurt their ability to track faster moving aircraft far more, most likely.
You have still failed to demonstrate that roof mounted HMGs are too good against helicopter rushes either way, so it’s all a moot point regardless.
How nice for your Abrams. Guess we just have to wait until you start playing the Swedish or the French lines at 8.3/8.7 to see you start advocating that all vehicles should get roof mounted .50s regardless on if they were equipped with them in real life.
Would you be interested to see a mechanic added which requires your crew to be exposed to use roof top machine guns?
Right. And? I said don’t charge a group of several tanks. Not don’t engage tanks.
What, do you want it so tanks can’t engage helicopter but helicopters can engage tanks?
No I would be more interested in a mechanic that didn’t give me the same map 4 times in row,Maybe that should be what Gaijin spend their time and money on.
Yes but that’s an issue for its own thread.
I have never advocated for this.