Turret is good but hull - paper as always. Still a fun tank to play
Because it would be the same situation as in the German tree.
Also aint no way that they are suffenly going to give the SEPv3 a longer reload seperately. Same with the 2A7V and not uparmored leos.
Also having less tanks with a 5 second reload would in turn give some of the other minor nations like Britain, Japan, Italy and Israel to breath.
How man felt saying that:

@SPANISH_AVENGER
Glad we all agree about the armor flaws.
Also, according to Chinese documents [not me] the pen of DTC-10 is correct.
Unless you’re speaking about a round not in game yet.
Haha first time in gajin poo game? xDD
Its balance factor when its fit them.
Its realism/historical factor when its fit them. Nothing more, nothing less, they dont care about anything, only about making this ruskies biased poo more biased, the armor of nato tanks should be like in steel beasts, which is TRUE simulator, not this crap with garbage small maps for kids (smaller maps than WOT have, oh yes, very realistic game mode, so realistic with a lot of markers, biased drones who just have magic spot system even after u die etc)
Garbage game from garbage devs for garbage players.
Oh, I know. I don’t trust a word that comes out of their mouths tbh.
so we are not balancing tank with their individual capability anymore? but using the whole family? no matter how bad that tank individual specs is for the br if there’s at least 1 tank that is amazing in its family it deserved to be nerfed?
Balance and realism are not exclusionary when it comes to reloads.
Absolutely.
Self-proclaimed “I care about overall balance and i love all tanks equally” rarely do as they preach.
Im just honest about having biases, no need to hide behind all that self righteous stuff.
Oh, how cool, meanwhile Abrams and leopard with a basket for the entire fighting compartment
It does kill them tho? Maybe techtree BMPT is somewhat different but BMPT-72 always dies from 30mm belt being hit
It actually has a 7 second reload; is it a chart error, or ingame one?
So you tell me, the allready OP Russian 10.3 - 10,7 Lineup get another buff? Whereas all Nato-Tanks cannot get there “good” reload without spending GE? Really great. When does anything else than Russia some love?
Abrams found dead in a ditch, the things only gimmick was an insanely good reload, now its just above average, not to mention the poor leopard who are matching russian tanks now
I will agree the chinese tanks are likely to be fine afterwards, russian tanks wont be fine.
Because gaijin is too incompetent to actually make it not, despite intending to (and accepting it as a bug).
Doesnt make it consistent though.
Guys, stop writing about reloading the leopard. all that prevents a leopard from living normally is a basket. We need to put up a riot and ask for a review of this awesome module.
While you accuse me of being biased towards Russia because I find these changes fine, others accuse me of being biased towards the U.S because I advocate for Abrams armor fixes. Each and every single time I advocate for fixes or improvements, I am accused of being a “X/Y/Z main”.
As soon as someone is not pushing your “my nation should get favourable treatments while all others should be neglected” narrative, you accuse them of being X/Y/Z mains.
Now Leopard tanks need reload buff, too. There are turret vids showing really fast turbo reloading, between 3-4 seconds. Some loaders are really exceptionally fast.
Well I also do play all nations and think that Leopard dont need any buffs at the moment.
Top tier, no. 2A4, arguablly no.
But what does 2A5/2A6 do that abrams cant do better?