3 Likes
Because the gap doesn’t exist or is more in favor of M1A2(s) with its 5s reload, so what do ya wanna do, argue that non-uparmored ones need to stay as they are just worse for no reason, or support nerfing M1s to 6s? :)
Nope, because that is why they are buffing the VT-4s.
Then they can buff Leo 2s to bring them in-line clearly.
1 Like
Reddit tier take
2 Likes
No, the take of someone who loves all tanks equally and doesn’t care about the petty “bias/suffering” contests of single nation mains who just want their favourite toys to be better than everyone else’s.
3 Likes
Its not the unbalanced bias that you are seeing, if anything I think the main crux of the point has gone over you.
These didnt need buffing at all, 0.1 or 0.5 seconds its irrelevant to its performance, what IS relevant is WHY they chose to do this when reports have ACTIVELY gone untouched for months/years.
DIRCM/LDIRCM over performing, untouched since last major update to name one crucial report. SPYDER and its awful radar underperforming etc.
I couldnt care for the 0.1s buff, I care as to WHY now
1 Like
According to you.
1 Like
ignore them, they have nothing but bias :)
The T-80 series now having a NATO-level 5 reload rate as a base reload rate:
I just expect people to now stop downplaying Russian tanks saying they still suffer.
2 Likes
is there a possibility of increasing the rate of fire for Comet I? QF77 was supposed to a production that sacrifice firepower to enhance human-machine efficiency, but now in war thunder its rate of fire is even worse than Firefly’s 17Pdr
2 Likes
I’m arguing that they should prioritize the biggest gaps/imbalances, which the Leopard 2s supposedly suffering isn’t one of.
2 Likes
Also, given that you seemingly do care about sources and historical accuracy again now, could we perhaps make the belts on BMPT/BMPT-72 actually kill the vehicle?
Or do you still consider these to be ““external belts””:
Src.: Uralvagonzavod Brochure - BMPT “THE TERMINATOR” (EN)
Src.: Uralvagonzavod Brochure - БМПТ «ТЕРМИНАТОР» (RU)
“850rds in two belts” hmm, almost as if there are only two belts in total, which would mean that the “internal/external” separation doesnt exist (as it’d require stowage/external belts per gun, thus 4 belts total).
Weird how there’s also no ready-rack ingame either, isnt it?
Almost as if there arent any “external belts” afterall.
28 Likes
Sure would be a shame if it was nerfed in armour last update :p
well, I’m on this. or I should say, it shouldn’t be buffed so much at once.
small changes are better, and now we are surely on the way to fully loading buff
i dont see how this would increase bmpt-72 sales
report closed)) not a bug))
6 Likes
This is another great point I hadn’t thought of!
If anything, people should be glad that the “Russia suffers” crowds just lost their biggest main point, which was the bad rates of fire.
I mean, T-72s and T-90s still have the exact same reload at 7 seconds (-0.1 is not making a difference), which is still the slowest in the game; but at least the T-80s now have a neat one. Not the best, but still neat.
The tanks I am most happy for are the Chinese ones, to be honest. They should be better Russian tanks, yet, until now (and still to some degree), they were merely worse Russian tanks. So any step towards improving the performance and accuracy of Chinese tanks is welcome for me.
1 Like
What about wz1001 LCT? It’s basically a 99A with longer barrel
Basically meaning you don’t care, should’ve said from the get-go, would’ve saved us both those 10 minutes.
supposedly suffering
I’m pretty sure I didn’t say the tanks are suffering. I said there’s no reason for non-uparmored ones to have to suffer from the success of their uparmored brothers, whilst not being nearly as potent but still having to content with having a slower than everybody else reload for no reason, kind of how 2A5 got dragged down back in the day due to 2A6s success in New Power.
2A5/2A6 are kinda mid tho. Anything they do, M1A1 HC and A2s do better.
People really do be thinking VT-4 is a wounded puppy while having meta mobility, good armor [not great, not meta; the composite array issues with the UFP is preventing it from being great.], and 3BM60 equivalent round.
All because VT-4 has a LFP the size of a Leopard 2’s that’s as easily penned as all other LFPs except Abrams’.
Just over 2 track links high for both of them.
YES! YES! YES! you have no clue how may times i have died in a brawl, with 0.1s left to reload in my T80
1 Like