Why would he lie about it ?
What does he has to gain from that ?
Why wouldn’t they? lol if you make it seem correct, even if you’re lying about it, many people will call to it like what has happened as if it’s a source. In which it isn’t.
Why would he lie about an experiment he has nothing to gain from lmao ?
So what I’ve found is that they wanted that details because new penetration formula they use requires all that to be inputted. Residual penetration and spalling is a completely separated thing.
There’s a lot of myths regarding this around, in short:
Stats that are NOT relevant to post-penetration damage:
- Weight of the projectile.
- Calibre of APFSDS penetrator.
- Velocity of APFSDS.
Stats that ARE relevant to post-penetration damage:
- Type classification in the game’s code, I.E., ‘longrod_’ suffix
- Residual penetration.
Or if said decent person shoots the drivers hatch / lower plate you go boom.
As people often forget somehow.
@An_Pigeon dont forget the lower plate is a 100% off switch