especially as its the same gun in near enough the exact same turret (from a crew ergonomics perspective)
So 5-6 would probably be historically accurate then?
2 Likes
well… manual reloads are still a balancing metric so…
unless @Smin1080p_WT clears that up, maybe something has changed
2 Likes
Can see the typical british tank loader doing a six second reload on chieftain.
Sweet. 6 second reload in the Mk10 and 900 :P
Nom nom nom
Straight to 9.7 for them then lol, and khalid xd
Genuinely I am surprised the T64A is still 9.3 I had no idea it got the buff as well, as i thought IRL it had many issues with it’s auto loader?
1 Like
IRL technical issues are rarely modeled in-game. Like the Soviets did such poor maintenance that Arkhangelsk shouldnt even be able to use her primary guns.
Btu yeah, Chieftains probably would sky rocket in BR.
As for T-series. Hopefully every single one gets a 0.3-0.7 BR increase next BR change. its needed. Some just dont have an excuse for their BRs anymore.
1 Like
As mobile as the MBT-70 is, it’s just not as good as the T-64A. The 20mm is just shell shatter heaven, the APFSDS it gets isn’t the greatest (or nearly as good as T-64A), the missiles are kind of useless, and the armor/survivability is abysmal (although, it is trolly sometimes).
average main behavior tbf
1 Like
Pfftt yeah okay. As if they need a br increase 😂
Surelyyy the T-90A is 11.3 material now since it got a 0.1 sec buff wowww. What a terrible take.
Also as for realism, a lot of the Brit tanks issues aren’t modeled in the game, and they have a long standing record of having some of the worst tanks known to man
Except in reality, the MBT-70 is actually better, higher survivability, better mobility, doesn’t sound like a lawn mower. Trolly armor that eats more things than it should, etc etc.
It’s APFSDS is plenty good enough, and isn’t a con. Just aim, for once…
I quite enjoyed spading those tanks
1 Like
I disagree. The Leclerc is really solid and at least easily on par with the 2A5-2A6.
It’s just that a lot of french mains want to make it look worse than it really is, generally so that they can keep stroking their ego.
2 Likes
But once the gun bolt of the Leclerc tank is pierced, it becomes a huge fireworks display. I don’t think Leclerc is weak, after all, his five second loading speed is far ahead of most opponents.
3 Likes
We are pleased that 99A has received a 0.43s buff.
I understand very well that .in Chinese communities, Chinese trees, British trees, and Israeli trees are known as the “狱三家”, meaning that the experience of playing these three trees is like going to jail.😐
oh come on, only a few of them got a notable performance increase
t64b and t80ud should ABSOLUTELY go up though, these two are crazy right now
but sad sacks like t80b just dont suck as much as they used to
6 Likes
every single one? Nah the T64A should go to 9.7 now, but the T80BVM for example is fine.
The T64B as well is alright at 10.0 now is okay, could potentially go to 10.3 IF the T80UD (which it should) goes to 10.7.
Not sure about the T80B not tried it out yet at all.
T80U as well will likely move up due to the sheer hordes of em.
That’s my point though half of it didn’t get posted.
Did the T64A not use the auto loader from the T72? as it was functional and actually worked, while the one for the T64 didn’t ?
I need to go back and use the MBT 70, though when I used the KPZ 70 it was better than the T64A, the 20MM gives it more utility against air, and light tanks, as well as barrel hunting. the mobility also allows it to take flanks and positions easier, hydro pnuematic suspension also gives it a distinct advantage in the hilly maps etc.
Which don’t tell me we don’t get cause we get them all the time.
Though it’s survivability and round keep it at 9.3.
The T64A has no MG, no reverse, can be UFP by most 120MM cannons, has an okay round, comparable to L23.
the reload buff is a major change but, 7.1 seconds to 6 is an over 2 second buff.
Different tanks have different roles though.
Pulled that one out the blue mate? other than pathetic WW2 tanks point me at one? centurion changed tank combat globally, as did chieftain, especially once they got the engine sorted out.
T64 based ones do.
T72 ones are fine.
You don’t understand how comparisons work man.
If the T64 has a better dart, that means the MBT70s worse dart is a con in that comparative situation.
It’s a poor dart for 9.3 TBF as well, it’s saving grace is the mobility, oh and a LRF.
Higher survivability? since when?
I know how abysmal the T series are survival wise but the MBT 70 is not better than a T64A.
on par with 2a5 maybe, the 2a6 blows it out the water, sayin that as I’ve used both.
better round, better armour, slightly less mobile.
gen 2 commander thermals.
better optics.
Worse reload?
I take it up to 12.7 still lol, id rather it than a T72 tbh
3 Likes
Are you for real? That thing is so sad, you basically trade armor, hmg, smokes, lrf just for slightly better mobility and a 6s reload.
1 Like
Leclerc is inferior to 2A7V, but that can be said about most top tier tanks anyways.
Against 2A5/2A6 it’s pretty well balanced and I consider them equals at the moment.
1 Like
Asking for a BR increase on every single one is diabolical, but that’s to be expected from someone with very limited knowledge about GRB.
5 Likes