It’s not a matter of race it’s a matter of who sells weapons to who. Can you imagine most trees without German or Russian hardware?
The new reload rates may need some fine tuning, but they are great!
It’s not a matter of race it’s a matter of who sells weapons to who. Can you imagine most trees without German or Russian hardware?
The new reload rates may need some fine tuning, but they are great!
i guess if autloaders are such a fixed value every t64 and t80 ever recorded loading must’ve been either broken or loading the furthest shell possible cause a 6 second reload time has never been seen.
Something something ideal conditions something something
i know you’re ironic but there are people genuinely saying this, despite both the t64 and t80 behind some of the most document tanks in the world.
good lord imagine a war thunder if only vehicles that were using 100% native tech could appear in a tree.
That would leave only the USSR and britain after ww2 for tanks and britain and america for cold war planes
At least my home nation would be meta as there wouldnt be any other choice for 60% of the game.
Exactly. It would be pathetic.
Most trees would be so silly looking.
literally nobody besides china us and ussr would have 5th gens.
To blanketly call all Leopards the “best balance of protection, mobility and firepower” is laughable as there are massive performance differences between each Leopard model.
I disagree, 6 seconds is impossible for the tank to sustain as explained in one of my reports as the 6 second figure excludes time to
1: move more than one shell (it is somewhat ignored for other tanks in fairness)
2: assuming the tank is stationary
3: ignores the fact that the breach needs to eject the shell prior to loading which adds nearly a second onto it
meaning unless the tank has nothing in the breach (it only does in game when it has no ammo) then the reload must be higher than 6 seconds and by the second shell (first reload in a normal GRB game) it cannot do a 6 second reload
he propably means leopard 2 which are all good tanks, leopard 1s have quite literally no protection lol
this guy read the manual btw, he knows what it should be
iirc some T series tanks cant have darts next to each other in the autoloader making the theoretical loading even worse.
gaijin doesnt understand this
im pretty sure gaijin thinks brass shell casings burn like the bag charges on chieftain.
Even then, theres some nuance to it. No one can convince me 2A4M is good.
I believe this is a safety and ease of use thing much like speed governors (which are modelled) which can be disabled but can be argued either way with proper sources
whereas the autoloader cannot physically insert a shell if its in the wrong place
idk i rarely see em, but when i do i dont really worry about them. i know virtually nothing on them just hasnt been much of threat in my experience
that is specifically 3bm60 and possibly other shells on earlier tanks like 3bm46 on the T72AV (that is not 100% known ive just heard stuff about it)
they also have 3bm60 loading too quickly by .1 second lol
they defo looked at the graph and said yeah we can say its 6.4 guys trust me
ignoring the fact that 1 turn (minimum) is half a second that lands it exactly onto 6 seconds and then the only difference between that graph and the T64A graph is that the carousel turns 2 more times giving it exactly a 7 second load time
curiously assuming 3bm60 is in every other one that means its in between 1 rotation and 3 rotations giving it exactly 0.5 seconds per rotation of shell
this is especially absurd as AZ tanks dont have this issue, and IRL AZ and MZ are considered equals, with AZ being safer and MZ being slightly faster, 1 full second faster in ideal conditiosn is absurd, 7 seconds on AZ is still pretty farfetched irl but its more believable than 6 seconds on MZ
Without going too offtopic, its 2A4 uptiered to 12.0 with minimal upgrades. For people who already have germany researched it doesnt offer anything over 2PL and for people wanting to grind the german TT its at BR meeting threats it should have zero reason facing.
I just checked and it seems they did change the armor on the T-64A, while the others appear to have been left untouched.
The table shows the effective protection at 0°C, with the red boxes representing the millimeters of steel armor alone (high-hardened armor is calculated for rolled homogeneous armor). The green box shows the effective protection in the game, and the blue box represents the effective protection if the other tanks had the same protection multiplier as the Textolite tank.
i wouldnt call it absurd when its timed in the source

its roughly 0.5-0.6 seconds for the recoil to set and then the gun can start to move and lock again starting the 6 second process
guessing its dart length being a limitation?
gaijin just assumes that each shell is in the perfect space each time? which is physically impossible then