Using Thai documents for the VT4… Where is the Thai VT4? I’m glad reload times are now more accurate, but seriously…
7 Likes
Certain part of the community cried hard enough mainly about it being too close to a certain date.
Any news on the Oplot’s hull front armor? It’s in pretty bad shape.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
4 Likes
I am aware but considering they just got the Abrams this is beyond stupid.
New reload rates A+
1 Like
It’s not a matter of race it’s a matter of who sells weapons to who. Can you imagine most trees without German or Russian hardware?
The new reload rates may need some fine tuning, but they are great!
1 Like
i guess if autloaders are such a fixed value every t64 and t80 ever recorded loading must’ve been either broken or loading the furthest shell possible cause a 6 second reload time has never been seen.
1 Like
Something something ideal conditions something something
i know you’re ironic but there are people genuinely saying this, despite both the t64 and t80 behind some of the most document tanks in the world.
good lord imagine a war thunder if only vehicles that were using 100% native tech could appear in a tree.
That would leave only the USSR and britain after ww2 for tanks and britain and america for cold war planes
At least my home nation would be meta as there wouldnt be any other choice for 60% of the game.
1 Like
Exactly. It would be pathetic.
Most trees would be so silly looking.
3 Likes
literally nobody besides china us and ussr would have 5th gens.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
To blanketly call all Leopards the “best balance of protection, mobility and firepower” is laughable as there are massive performance differences between each Leopard model.
I disagree, 6 seconds is impossible for the tank to sustain as explained in one of my reports as the 6 second figure excludes time to
1: move more than one shell (it is somewhat ignored for other tanks in fairness)
2: assuming the tank is stationary
3: ignores the fact that the breach needs to eject the shell prior to loading which adds nearly a second onto it
meaning unless the tank has nothing in the breach (it only does in game when it has no ammo) then the reload must be higher than 6 seconds and by the second shell (first reload in a normal GRB game) it cannot do a 6 second reload
7 Likes
he propably means leopard 2 which are all good tanks, leopard 1s have quite literally no protection lol
this guy read the manual btw, he knows what it should be
iirc some T series tanks cant have darts next to each other in the autoloader making the theoretical loading even worse.
gaijin doesnt understand this
im pretty sure gaijin thinks brass shell casings burn like the bag charges on chieftain.
Even then, theres some nuance to it. No one can convince me 2A4M is good.
I believe this is a safety and ease of use thing much like speed governors (which are modelled) which can be disabled but can be argued either way with proper sources
whereas the autoloader cannot physically insert a shell if its in the wrong place
2 Likes
idk i rarely see em, but when i do i dont really worry about them. i know virtually nothing on them just hasnt been much of threat in my experience