No, YOU tell me.
Does all of this come off as “anti-Leopard bias” to you? Enough of this nonsense.
3 Likes
And yet here you are, dismissing my concern that Leo2s might fall behind while procilaming they are the best (kinda contradicting yourself) on grounds that your take is just more objective than take of me, an average peasant.
Because they won’t fall behind.
As an all-nation player, you know what my interest is? For every nation to be balanced, fun and enjoyable equally.
THAT is my only and true bias: for full balance across the board for true enjoyment no matter what you are playing.
What I do not want is for the Leopards to stomp and be above everyone else because then there’s no point in playing anything that isn’t a Leopard.
But same goes for EVERY tank. What do you think I was doing when T-80BVM was the OP and broken tank? Yes, askingfor realistic nerfs and the addition of counterparts for other nations. And you know what people called me? “anti-Russia hater”. Just like now some of you suggest I have a bias towards Russia for supporting these changes.
As an all-nation player, I want to have fun with EVERY nation without having to default back to Leopards because these just happen to be the very best.
So: as I said, I have no biases towards nor against any nation. I do not wish for any nation to be above nor beneath any other. My only bias is towards full-fledged balance.
The T80BVM will always be the chariot of the window lickers at top tier, its easy to play but not the best top tier tank
If you are somewhat good at the game, you will do better in an Abrams or Leopard
1 Like
Bet people will still buy turms t instead of ud even after those changes
Turms may be slower on nearly every category, but it has thermals, I can’t blame them.
2 Likes
Yes and a sustained rate of fire should incur longer reloads but that would quickly become a non issue if you aren’t firing 10 rounds lol and give some time between shots
But are those thermals worth being worse than ud in every aspect? Plus majority of maps are cqc counter strike where thermals wouldnt help you much. Unlike 6s reload and t80u chassis
You straight up sound like Alvis.
By what metric they stomp? What exact model of Leopard 2 stomps, since there are lot of them spread over 2 full BRs?
General stat dont show Leopard 2s overperfoming maybe with exception of 2A7V, my personal stats show Leopard 2A4 performing worse than both UD and M1 Abrams.
So by what metric they stomp?
Sure. Everything is nice and dandy.
1 Like
Dude… the only Top Tier tanks you have played are Leopards.
Germany. That’s all you have at Top Tier.
How can you pretend that your take on Top Tier tanks can be possibly more educated and objective than the take of someone who actively plays every single tank in Top Tier? Now, seriously.
And for the record, I would not even be bringing this up if I weren’t growing tired of your constant attacks and disrespect.
I’d say no, but its not like having 2nd gen thermals at 10.3 is negligible either. For instance on forest maps, that leap in image quality is all the difference you need to do quite good games even with mediocre vehicles.
1 Like
And I have played both russian 10.3 and US 10.7, having more success in both than that of Leopard 2s.
Your point being?
Do you need to eat feces to know its a bad idea?
t72 change is fine, t80 t64 change is nonsense. that cyclogram is virtually the only source that ever states such low times, and isnt really congruent with reality.
chinese autoloaders have been needing fixed for a long time.
10.3 and 10.7 are not remotely close to Top Tier.
Having played a bit of M1 and T-80UD does not give you a single notion of how T-90M and M1A2 SEPv2 perform in Top Tier.
This is the level we are getting into now…?
What exactly is argument here? 12.0 Abrams playing completly differently to 10.7 one? Or are we ignoring that up until recently, 10.7 tanks could see 11.7 tanks in battles naturally?
I dont need to play BVM to know it will struggle with 5° of gun depresion if I played 80UD with same 5° of gun depression.
Similiarly, I dont need to play M2K to know trying to beat it in one circle in F-4S is terrible idea.
I mean you want to claim that you cant have objective opinion without trying or playing something first. You kinda played yourself here. So what is it, can educated opinion be achieved by 3rd party sources, or did you ignore your mom and had to find by yourself?
Then you’re speaking from a limited lens
There’s nothing OP about T72 at 9.3, as it is just a BR standard tank for other 9.3, a OF-40 or Leopard 1A5 will kill it no issue.
If you use the M60A2 i will still slaughter you in my Gal Batash, Olifant mk.2, Type 96, Kpz-70, while being mostly immune to you.
If you wish to complain you may complain about decompression, not T-72.
there are quite a few videos of T64/T80s shooting the same shells back to back with footage from the crew compartment, you’ll never see a reload time as low as 6 seconds, the only source which states such low reload time is the cyclogram people cling too, but you cannot that 1 piece of evidence in a vacuum, and ignore everything else.
Ok… maybe I’m missing something, so let me ask something:
What would be the point of playing;
-Arietes
-Challenger 2s
-Abrams
-Leclercs
-Merkavas
If Leopard 2s got a 5 second reload, negating the ONE advantage these have over them?
1 Like
General stats also show tanks like the VT4 and Challenger 2s outperforming the Leopard 2s.
I wouldn’t say that the VT4 and CR2 are on par or better than the Leopard 2s though.
6 Likes
T64A is reasonable change.
The rest im not sure.