Remove all other Techtrees, lets all just play russia. Oh wait that wont work retaining those win rates. Nevermind bad idea
1 Like
Every russian autoloader “pre-indexes” the next shell of same type - in example if you are firing HEAT the autoloader will automaticaly keep preparing you HEAT shells until you as a gunner decide to change shell type.
The ideal way would be for gaijin to implement slightly longer reload when you change shell typee due to the need of the carousel to change position.
because theres no argument.
you absolutely are. You know who else self-proclaims to be objective? Alvis.
3 Likes
This was an understandable buff for the Chinese tanks. They are much closer to the NATO tanks stat wise then I think people realize. Massive LFP, ok pen, but still relatively cramped and easy to kill. So again, an understandable change for the Chinese tanks.
1 Like
Look… you claim that “I am not objective” because I am fine with a slight improvement on Russian and Chinese tanks.
Others claim that “I am not objective” because I expect fixes and improvements towards American, British, French, Japanese, etc tanks.
You are no different. As soon as I don’t ride your… ship, I am “just biased/subjective towards X nation”.
1 Like
And when everyone is playing Russia... no one will play it.
Well, this is worrying… I am not that well-experienced in all WT top-tier, having gotten there relatively recently. But my experience shooting Leos and shooting T-series so far with my Challengers says that anywhere but point blank Leos are already much easier to disable by shooting into the huge lfp, or by disabling the basket. Now with T-80s getting a buff in reload that Leos can only match with top tier crews and GEs… Leos are going to suffer more (
I just hope they will look at the basket again and either decouple it from the turret rotation on Leos and Abramses or link the basket on the T-tanks too (and do a pass on other nations? - i.e.Challengers don’t have the baskets atm, should they?) - rather than just tweak BRs.
1 Like
I dont particullary care about what others called you.
I claim you are not objective because you self-proclaim to be. If your opinion would be objective, it wouldnt need to be explicitly stated that it is objective. My issue isnt with your opinion, my issue is with you pretending you dont have any biases.
3 Likes
devs def got what they wanted there Russian is easily the most played nation in the game rn by a pretty big margin
This is my point all along. This is hands down the main reason I think this whole move was unnecessary. It’s unfair for most of people who don’t have either the GE or the SL to invest on three/four MBT crews to just EQUAL a stock reload time.
1 Like
First of all, this isn’t whining. It’s a fact that Gaijin favors Russia—Russia needs to be nerfed. Secondly, if we don’t speak up, Gaijin will let this situation persist indefinitely—and I think that’s exactly what you want. You’re like the petty bureaucrats in Shakespeare’s plays, stuffing your faces while demanding that starving refugees stop protesting.
1 Like
Are you a statistics adept? Can’t you just talk about facts? You probably just want all Soviet tanks to be automatically destroyed at the first glance. It’s obvious. Better yet, go play World of Tanks with that approach.
The T64B does not need a buff; it is good enough with the armour and firepower it has.
However, it may be justified for T80B.
Mind yall that the Chinese literally built that win rate great wall with our flesh and blood. (although I’m not the one really putting the effort there, only having mine below 50%)… not like how the Russia mains built theirs.
2 Likes
Uhh we are talking about balance right? Not realistic irl reload rate?
Cause for balance then yeah it does
What made 2a4 deserve to have 6s reload when the most of 120mm nato have 5s reload and either better armor or pen than 2a4?
What made 2a5/6 deserve to have 6s reload when m1a2 and m1a1hc have 5s reload and everything pretty much equal?
What made 2a4m can deserve to have 6s reload when m1a2 and a1hc have 5s reload on top of better shell and armor?
And back to sepv3, what made m1a2 sepv2,v1, standard a2 and a1hc deserve to have it reload back to 6s when the current 5s is ballanced and only sep v3 that getting the upgrade?
Bit misleading there, those are the sim rates not the grb rates.
What is your goddamn point suppossed to be?
That Russia is now OP and there’s Russian bias, and anyone who disagrees is “just not being objective”?
Is this what it is about, or is this just some petty trolling? I genuinely can’t tell what your goal is suppossed to be here.
1 Like
- person asks him to post sim rates
- posts sim rates in response
- “thats really misleading bro”
“favors Russia” especially in ARB, or in GRB before su34, yeah sure
You’re NOT comparing Spanish with Alvis.
The first has its own reasons to believe certain stuff, with a cohesive logic throughout most of the posts the former makes.
Alvis is plain delusional, he contradicts himself from one post to the next and sometimes his intention to gaslight is plain obvious. And I don’t care if I get flagged for saying that, cuz it’s the truth.
12 Likes