this is so peak now we only need leopard 2 reload buff
New Tank?
Will 105mm merkavas also see a firerate change? I feel like the Mk.2D especially needs it at 10.0
6.7 sec reload with a 105 in 10.0 is kinda sad
Forced to spend GE or grind countless hours to get ACE, only for it to match the most common T series.
WZ1001(E) LCT and ZTZ99A are literally the same, why there is a difference?
No, VT-4B is just the internal file name for VT-4A1
The T-64A 100% is getting moved up. Probably the T-80UD as well. A 6 sec autoloader at 9.3. It basically is a 9.3 Type 90
and what about the WZ1001, it has a similar automatic loader design as the ZTZ99A
I wonder where the UD will go now considering it already should have been 10.7 without the buff
Idk how this all works on mobile but the T64A cycle diagram clearly says 7 seconds
This is also assuming that the rate of fire for the autoloader is on maximum at all times so when do the Japanese tanks get their non sustainable fire rates just like these tanks
Following onto that, this is just poorly timed with the BMPT being evidently too powerful from a toddlers glance (fact checked)
I can assume that the extensive research was actually conducted to find out how to buff a Russian tank without upsetting the playerbase too much
guys u set the wrong number for t-80b and t-64b , they both set to 7 sec


I support a reload buff.
Challenger 2s getting their first stage fixed.
And Challenger 3 as you mentioned.
I don’t have a comment on Merkava Mk3, just no objections.
now, dont forget to give them a proper BR too
Thai VT-4 when
Reload rate is a balancing tool. Japanese tanks dont need the better firerate. What japanese tanks need is a fix to their steering and transmissions
Autoloaders aren’t subject to balancing rules
So with the Challenger 3TD over BRed, can it finally get 5 second reload, maybe make it worth using over the Challenger 2s at 11.7? If not, can it go down to 11.7? Where even then, its probably not worth using without 5 second reload
very cool
this is so strange… cuz i have the full document here on my second screen… and last time someone tried to report something on the VT-4 using this exact manual, they were told to not use this document.
so please gaijin, why cant we use the same sources that you use, hmmmm?
Yes they are?