Revising the Rate of Fire of the T-64, T-80, Т-72, ZTZ96, ZTZ99 Series and VT4, VT4A1 Tanks

Please make more threads like this. It empowers community discussion on balance, and shows that you actually care about the discussion we have regarding balance. Thank you for this.

I dont know what you are on about, but I do have expert crew, and its nowhere near close to being aced after 191 battles.

advantages completly nullified on urban maps and advantages which lot of Leopard 2 contemporaries also have.

once again im not trashing the content of your opinion, but your attitude.

1 Like

Strv122/Leo2a7hu/Black Night thanks to aps

M1 abrams/Kpz70/Type90/Leclerc

M1 series/Challenger series/Type90/Type10/Leclerc series/Modern Merkavas

Aint no way chinese tanks have longer reloads even after the patch

I, for a fact, am objective, yes. Proof of it is that every time I open my mouth I am accused of a different “bias” by someone different… as if my consistent posts, comments and bug reports favouring tanks from every nation weren’t enough.

I have managed to piss off practically every nation’s mains because they claim that “I am biased towards (X) other nation” or “biased against their nation”.

If I really were so biased, it would be easy to have a consensus on what the hell I am suppossed to be biased towards or against. Instead, every main just accuses me of a different bias every time.

I am not the one bringing up my objectivity out of nowhere. The palpable evidence is out there and it was not made by me.

“My attitude”? I only started being not-so-kind after hours of constant nonsense and disrespect from you.

Funnily enough I find 105 M1 to be better than 2A4s in both areas. Prolly has to do with the 5 sec reload and better ready rack/ammo stowage. But I get you.

bro stop replying to my posts if your reply is full of shit. thanks

they have really good tanks 11.0
and under top tier is mid mid mid.

@Stona_WT, How come 2 of those only got reduced to 7.0sec?

1 Like

The russian cope is insane

Plus, as someone brought up to me via PM, T-80BVM’s reload is 6.4 seconds with 3BM60.

No idea whether it’s intentional or just a mess.

image

you know what, sure. If thats how it works, then I proclaim myself to be the richest man on the earth. Time to start spending big time, prolly buy Nvidia and fix the RAM shortages or something like that. Crazy how easy the solution was.

mmh. sure.

sure thing captain objective opinion. sorry I dared to offend you. I learned my lesson and will never quetion your royal authority ever again.

1 Like

At this point you are just yapping nonsense.

All you do is whine about how subjective I am and about how much of a lie it is that I am objective… with zero evidence of this and completely disregarding the plenity of evidence that proves that you are wrong.

Now you don’t even try to make it look like actual argumentation…

1 Like

As you say your royal objectivness.

Ok main

2 Likes

Judging by pictures their mz should have 6s as well. On AP, HEAT and HE. Except that У ammunition but I have no clue what does that mean. Maybe training one (Учебный) but unsure.

Управляемый” the 9M119 ATGM and such.

lmao, he isnt wrong in except the armor thing which can be debated with USSR tanks having a better frontal armor layout with smaller weakspots. in everything else hes right with mobility and reload rate.

Ah true I forgot about agtms completely

1 Like

War Thunder Screenshot 2025.12.25 - 18.21.46.64 - Copia
guys the 3BM60 alone on the T80BVM alone has a unique reload time of 6,4 instead of 6,0 as every other one (T80U’s 3BM46 doesn’t have it) is it a bug perhaps?

@Stona_WT

2 Likes