Anyone disagreeing with me must be biased
I have made PLENITY of arguments explaining why this change is good, yet all you do is whine about how bad it is and how bad I am for supporting it. And you are NO ONE to tell me to shut up.
4 Likes
Youre human, you have biases and its naive to pretend otherwise.
Of course! I think the autoloader change was unnecessary for the T-80s, therefore you’re not a brunette. :P
by that logic every 9.3 vehicle should be moved up, for e.g Khalid in my opinion much better than t72a and it’s at the same br
1 Like
Then tell me which are my biases. Come on.
Am I biased towards Russia? Towards China? Towards the U.S? Towards Germany? Because I’ve had plenity of people accuse me of all of those simultaneously.
So… come on; which am I actually biased towards? I am sure you can make up your minds and come up with something, since it’s so clear!
2 Likes
T-64B, and T-80B are at 7 seconds not 6.
ground br needs raise for 14.0 and move these tanks at 10.0+ br
not all 8.3 have these rounds as example:
I’m just saying no one, including me, can be objective, and the bias are based on each one’s education, belief, upbringing, (and in WT gaming experience) etc. For me I must admit I’m biased for the Chinese TT to get a better treatment, due to I speaking Mandarin and all, that’s my bias based on my personal background. And since everyone’s background is so diverse, there won’t be someone who is absolutely objective. Those who are absolutely objective must have no background at all.
What the others think where your bias lies is dependent on their intepretation, which also depends (at least partially) their biases.
1 Like
Statcards are prolly not accurate as it mentions they are supposed to be 6.0 in stona’s message
T-64B and T-80B are at 7s each it wasn’t implemented correctly
1 Like
This…. Others acting like only one guy has bias is hilarious
Also yay! I can feel the diffrence already the reload buff is amazing.
Imma check the datamines as well. Im pretty sure even T-80BVM was still 6.5s. After the update, which is wrong but bug reports are up. They prolly messed up or missed something
Finally…! My training as a history minor at college finally pays off (just kidding)
1 Like
My only bias is towards depicting ALL MBTs accurately and faithfully to their real life selves within the realms of balance.
I could not care less about the nation they are from. That’s my point.
I have argued towards improving the Leclercs, the Challengers, the Abrams, the Merkavas, the Leopards, and so, neither do I mind improvements towards Russian or Chinese tanks.
I have supported improvements on EVERY SINGLE MBT from EVERY SINGLE NATION. And as long as I do so, and I always will, I will continue correctly stating that no, I have no biases towards nor against any nation nor its vehicles.
6 Likes
Baseeeed
1 Like
Your first response to me was this
Followed by self-proclaming how objective you are.
If you later rectified that, good for you.
Never claimed its clear, but you obviously have some sort of bias against Leos or Germany since you seem to ignore actuall issues of Leopard 2s and continuing to claim that “they are teh best” with the new autoloader changes
they added a line for the 3BM60 that gave it specifically 6.4s
Lololol…. @Stona_WT can we get a fix for that or something? Like im pretty sure they are supposed to be 6.0s
I have demanded for add-on armor module fixes for Leopard 2A7s.
I have demanded for acceleration fixes for Leopard 2A7s.
I have demanded DM53 for Leopard 2PL until it got it.
I have demanded for slpprj m/95 for the Strv 122s until they got it.
I have asked to revise the thermal quality/resolution of the Leopard 2s.
I argued to reduce the damage model hitbox of the Leopard 2s turret basket modules until they did it.
I have repeatedly demanded and attempted to fix/improve the armor of the gun mantlets and trunnions of the Leopard tanks.
WHAT are you on about?
1 Like