Revising the Rate of Fire of the T-64, T-80, Т-72, ZTZ96, ZTZ99 Series and VT4, VT4A1 Tanks

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
26

Not hugely
Some are wrong (Strv 103) bc no one got an actual report in before recent
And most are based on numbers that aren’t it’s sustained fire speed (such as this) and so are slower than their maximum

27

WZ1001 should share the same technological source as the ZTZ99A, both being the modernized Chinese improved version of the carousel autoloader. It should have a reload time of 6.66 seconds, like the 99A, rather than the 7.0-second reload of the T-72 series.

13 Likes
28

cool. when is all the NATO tanks getting their better realistic reloads then?

18 Likes
30

But doesn’t the autoloader need to turn to pick up the next shell. So what they are saying is that this is the reload time with the next shell pre-indexed, which should not be happening when you are firing shell after shell

31

You are saying that WITHOUT A ACE CREW NATO TANK CANNOT COMPARE TO T80s EVEN THEY SPENT 1MILLION MORE SLs

9 Likes
32

finally, now time to give the tkx/type its 2s autoloader and the leopards a 4s ace loader, oh wait it’s not how it works in this game

10 Likes
33

To bring them in-line with everybody else?

Russian nor Chinese tanks needed better reloads, yet here we are.

3 Likes
34

Give every east vehicle reload buff and nerf every Nato vehicle turret basket

5 Likes
35

It’s so funny they use Thai VT-4 as sources but they won’t add it lolllll @Deathmisser

17 Likes
36

The cycle chart assumes you are turning for 3 spaces each time and it does that as the gun locks and elevates etc

37

please dont talk about balance when they refuse to actively balance CAS but will selectively nerf brimstones because no counter (which I agree with) yes reload is a balance method but they sure as hell dont balance the game if thats what you think

5 Likes
39

Giving japanese tanks 2s reload would make them broken… They dont need it, the 4 sec reload is more than good enough…

3 Likes
40

They already have em lol, i mean we could have it be more realistic by having all NATO crews actually hold ammo outside the blowout racks and lap load them thus having an even easier time getting that ammo detonation xD

4 Likes
41

good, so when will these bug fixed? T-72B’s roof have no thickness // Gaijin.net // Issues

1 Like
42

so wht not the WZ 1001? It just another ZTZ-99A

6 Likes
43

Bwahahahahahhahahahha.

3 Likes
44

Time to give leopards 5 sec reload, like every other top tier manually loaded tank?

12 Likes
45

Surely you will disable the auto-destabilization of APFSDS by relict and contact-5 as compensation, right?
Surely you will make the autoloader-module create spall, right?
Surely you will add the basket the crew sits in, right?
Surely you will make the trunnions not have 150mm - up to 300mm CHA effective, right?
Surely you will make the trunnions create spall, right?
Surely you will remove the hidden plate infront of the breech that eats all spall, right?
Surely you will remove the hidden 2mm plate around the T-64 and T-80s autoloader, right?
Surely you will make the armour around the autoloader (T- 64, 80, 72, 90) create spall, right?

Surely you will compensate by removing a few of the artificial survivability buffs listed above, right?

83 Likes
46

1 mil SL is basically nothing by the time you are at that BR lol

47

rebalance NATO reload times especially leopard2s

3 Likes