I was searching too, I feel your pain.
That’s the thing, if was done as a balance change I’m fine with it as long as it’s within the mechanical limits and they’re honest about it.
It’s the wheeling out documentation to justify it, without simply acknowledging it’s for balance purposes which gets my goat.
So when it comes to NATO tanks reload is balancing tool and technical documents and historical sources don’t matter … but for russian tanks suddenly technical documents no matter how questionable are super important and must be used for buffing reload and balance doesn’t matter at all
game balance in War Thunder was always sketchy, but now it is completely going down the drain and turning into nothing more than inferiority complex bandaid for one desperate nation
so when nato tanks\cas were exactly like that it was fine? wait for the meta shift as it usually happens and stop crying
russian tank winrate has nothing to do with actual tanks (russian tanks are still worse in general)
Lmao, the reflection is quite strong on this one. Let’s end this joke, then.
This was your response to me saying that I found this reload change because I had no biases towards nor against any nation. Are you going to keep playing dumb and pretend you were not suggesting that I have a bias towards Russia for not playing along with your claims that it’s a display of such?
self-harm is no joke.
Spanish Avenger concluding that criticism aimed at his self-proclaimed objectivness means hes being accused of having pro-X nation bias.
Not once I mentioned russia in my criticism towards you. In fact it was you dragging russia into this, as some weird way to deflect said criticism.
In fact its more telling that you think this was me accusing you of having pro-X nation bias more than anything lol.
that point is also literally not true and you only think that because the greater turrent basket it invisible on Russian tanks but the ammo part of the autoloader is part of the lower turret basket.
so when is chieftain and challenger going to beat them all out then? as its projectile and fully combustable bag charge
far lighter than the rest
I can just tell you haven’t played the ZTZ/vt4 tanks, you probably don’t have any top tiers. The 7.1 second reload is pure suffering and agony and before you call me trash I have a 1800+ rating on all Chinese mbt’s in stat shark(beside wz. The Chinese mbts really did need this buff, while sure i wish it was 6.5 when playing China you gotta take what the snail gives you. Also spall liners, bug report accepted for 3 years now 3 years. Not even the bs fuel tanks can save you when you get penned. Also ZTZ99A2 when (gets aps).
Me: as an all nation player, I think this change is fine.
You: REEEE YOU NO OBJECTIVE YOU SUBJECTIVE YOU HAS BIAS AND ARE PRETENTIOUS
it is true, and everyone knows that or at least people who understands something about soviet vehicles
Remove all other Techtrees, lets all just play russia. Oh wait that wont work retaining those win rates. Nevermind bad idea
Every russian autoloader “pre-indexes” the next shell of same type - in example if you are firing HEAT the autoloader will automaticaly keep preparing you HEAT shells until you as a gunner decide to change shell type.
The ideal way would be for gaijin to implement slightly longer reload when you change shell typee due to the need of the carousel to change position.
because theres no argument.
you absolutely are. You know who else self-proclaims to be objective? Alvis.
This was an understandable buff for the Chinese tanks. They are much closer to the NATO tanks stat wise then I think people realize. Massive LFP, ok pen, but still relatively cramped and easy to kill. So again, an understandable change for the Chinese tanks.
Look… you claim that “I am not objective” because I am fine with a slight improvement on Russian and Chinese tanks.
Others claim that “I am not objective” because I expect fixes and improvements towards American, British, French, Japanese, etc tanks.
You are no different. As soon as I don’t ride your… ship, I am “just biased/subjective towards X nation”.
Well, this is worrying… I am not that well-experienced in all WT top-tier, having gotten there relatively recently. But my experience shooting Leos and shooting T-series so far with my Challengers says that anywhere but point blank Leos are already much easier to disable by shooting into the huge lfp, or by disabling the basket. Now with T-80s getting a buff in reload that Leos can only match with top tier crews and GEs… Leos are going to suffer more (
I just hope they will look at the basket again and either decouple it from the turret rotation on Leos and Abramses or link the basket on the T-tanks too (and do a pass on other nations? - i.e.Challengers don’t have the baskets atm, should they?) - rather than just tweak BRs.
I dont particullary care about what others called you.
I claim you are not objective because you self-proclaim to be. If your opinion would be objective, it wouldnt need to be explicitly stated that it is objective. My issue isnt with your opinion, my issue is with you pretending you dont have any biases.
