Revising the Rate of Fire of the T-64, T-80, Т-72, ZTZ96, ZTZ99 Series and VT4, VT4A1 Tanks

Official News, Development Blogs and Updates
15

now, dont forget to give them a proper BR too

14 Likes
16

Thai VT-4 when

12 Likes
17

Reload rate is a balancing tool. Japanese tanks dont need the better firerate. What japanese tanks need is a fix to their steering and transmissions

6 Likes
18

Autoloaders aren’t subject to balancing rules

4 Likes
19

So with the Challenger 3TD over BRed, can it finally get 5 second reload, maybe make it worth using over the Challenger 2s at 11.7? If not, can it go down to 11.7? Where even then, its probably not worth using without 5 second reload

20 Likes
20

very cool

21

this is so strange… cuz i have the full document here on my second screen… and last time someone tried to report something on the VT-4 using this exact manual, they were told to not use this document.

so please gaijin, why cant we use the same sources that you use, hmmmm?

87 Likes
22

Yes they are?

1 Like
23

I cant read Russian, but does the cyclogram include the time to elevate the gun to the reload position.

1 Like
24

Why the heck would you buff Leopards? They’re already damn good, and 6 seconds is still a great reload, on par with Soviet and Chinese models.

6 Likes
25

Yes but the autoloader does other things whilst the gun does that so the time is roughly correct assuming the autoloader doesn’t have to turn really at all

26

Not hugely
Some are wrong (Strv 103) bc no one got an actual report in before recent
And most are based on numbers that aren’t it’s sustained fire speed (such as this) and so are slower than their maximum

27

WZ1001 should share the same technological source as the ZTZ99A, both being the modernized Chinese improved version of the carousel autoloader. It should have a reload time of 6.66 seconds, like the 99A, rather than the 7.0-second reload of the T-72 series.

13 Likes
28

cool. when is all the NATO tanks getting their better realistic reloads then?

18 Likes
30

But doesn’t the autoloader need to turn to pick up the next shell. So what they are saying is that this is the reload time with the next shell pre-indexed, which should not be happening when you are firing shell after shell

31

You are saying that WITHOUT A ACE CREW NATO TANK CANNOT COMPARE TO T80s EVEN THEY SPENT 1MILLION MORE SLs

9 Likes
32

finally, now time to give the tkx/type its 2s autoloader and the leopards a 4s ace loader, oh wait it’s not how it works in this game

10 Likes
33

To bring them in-line with everybody else?

Russian nor Chinese tanks needed better reloads, yet here we are.

3 Likes
34

Give every east vehicle reload buff and nerf every Nato vehicle turret basket

5 Likes
35

It’s so funny they use Thai VT-4 as sources but they won’t add it lolllll @Deathmisser

17 Likes