Basically meaning you don’t care, should’ve said from the get-go, would’ve saved us both those 10 minutes.
supposedly suffering
I’m pretty sure I didn’t say the tanks are suffering. I said there’s no reason for non-uparmored ones to have to suffer from the success of their uparmored brothers, whilst not being nearly as potent but still having to content with having a slower than everybody else reload for no reason, kind of how 2A5 got dragged down back in the day due to 2A6s success in New Power.
People really do be thinking VT-4 is a wounded puppy while having meta mobility, good armor [not great, not meta; the composite array issues with the UFP is preventing it from being great.], and 3BM60 equivalent round.
All because VT-4 has a LFP the size of a Leopard 2’s that’s as easily penned as all other LFPs except Abrams’.
Just over 2 track links high for both of them.
But slow reverse is such a suffering((((( russia very weak still, please add Obj 490B door wedge with 3 meters RHAe frontal protection and Su-57M4 with LDIRCM and 360 degree AESA(((
Alright, can you reverse the artificial NATO hump nerf on leopards?
I’m so convinced Gaijin gets paid by Russian government to keep buffing their vehicles.
Also fyi, I have always been in favor of reducing the reload of all 120mm Abrams tanks back to 6 seconds whenever they introduce SEPv3 as a 2A7/122 counterpart.
It’s just that German mains want the former to happen but not the latter.
Lmao they have to have weeks or months of researches and community complaints to buff some garbage can, especially if this can is Russian. At least with this buff giving natoids competitive CAS will be somewhat justified
why should a2 sepv2 and below get longer reload when sepv3 is the better tank? they should keep their 5s and sepv3 get 6s, the whole tank family doesn’t deserve to be nerfed just because there’s 1 great tank at the end of the line
