Sure would be a shame if it was nerfed in armour last update :p
well, I’m on this. or I should say, it shouldn’t be buffed so much at once.
small changes are better, and now we are surely on the way to fully loading buff
i dont see how this would increase bmpt-72 sales
report closed)) not a bug))
10 Likes
This is another great point I hadn’t thought of!
If anything, people should be glad that the “Russia suffers” crowds just lost their biggest main point, which was the bad rates of fire.
I mean, T-72s and T-90s still have the exact same reload at 7 seconds (-0.1 is not making a difference), which is still the slowest in the game; but at least the T-80s now have a neat one. Not the best, but still neat.
The tanks I am most happy for are the Chinese ones, to be honest. They should be better Russian tanks, yet, until now (and still to some degree), they were merely worse Russian tanks. So any step towards improving the performance and accuracy of Chinese tanks is welcome for me.
1 Like
What about wz1001 LCT? It’s basically a 99A with longer barrel
2 Likes
Basically meaning you don’t care, should’ve said from the get-go, would’ve saved us both those 10 minutes.
supposedly suffering
I’m pretty sure I didn’t say the tanks are suffering. I said there’s no reason for non-uparmored ones to have to suffer from the success of their uparmored brothers, whilst not being nearly as potent but still having to content with having a slower than everybody else reload for no reason, kind of how 2A5 got dragged down back in the day due to 2A6s success in New Power.
2A5/2A6 are kinda mid tho. Anything they do, M1A1 HC and A2s do better.
People really do be thinking VT-4 is a wounded puppy while having meta mobility, good armor [not great, not meta; the composite array issues with the UFP is preventing it from being great.], and 3BM60 equivalent round.
All because VT-4 has a LFP the size of a Leopard 2’s that’s as easily penned as all other LFPs except Abrams’.
Just over 2 track links high for both of them.
YES! YES! YES! you have no clue how may times i have died in a brawl, with 0.1s left to reload in my T80
1 Like
But slow reverse is such a suffering((((( russia very weak still, please add Obj 490B door wedge with 3 meters RHAe frontal protection and Su-57M4 with LDIRCM and 360 degree AESA(((
1 Like
Alright, can you reverse the artificial NATO hump nerf on leopards?
I’m so convinced Gaijin gets paid by Russian government to keep buffing their vehicles.
4 Likes
Also fyi, I have always been in favor of reducing the reload of all 120mm Abrams tanks back to 6 seconds whenever they introduce SEPv3 as a 2A7/122 counterpart.
It’s just that German mains want the former to happen but not the latter.
1 Like
Donut worry broski, we will soon see the T-15 with 2S38s cannon at 10.0 ))))
Sure, we all know how amazing and the best are russian garbage shi**, everything on ukraine its a fake, they didnt lose any of those amazing tanks.
Not powerful enough(((( please make afghanit APS reflect darts back to evil HATO shooter so T-14 and T-15 can be balans((((
Yea and T-14 on 11.3
Leperds are soooo week gajen plz buff
1 Like
You didn’t mention anything about the giant car set of VT4, the prominent loading machine, and the bikini lining…
2 Likes
VT-4’s UFP has been bugged since release and sliced through easily as well, so it’s not just the LFP.
Until now, it also had a miserable 7.1 second reload.
Oh, speaking of which; it should be MUCH better than 3BM60, and, instead, it’s worse.
5 Likes
Lmao they have to have weeks or months of researches and community complaints to buff some garbage can, especially if this can is Russian. At least with this buff giving natoids competitive CAS will be somewhat justified