Revising the Rate of Fire of the T-64, T-80, Т-72, ZTZ96, ZTZ99 Series and VT4, VT4A1 Tanks

Nope, because that is why they are buffing the VT-4s.

The gap between the non-uparmored Leo 2s and M1A2 is a lot smaller than the gap between the VT-4 and Leo 2s.

If you think they are seriously suffering currently than I don’t even know what to say.

Holy shit my forum is dying.

7 Likes

why??

The one time Gajins bug reporting team puts in an ounce of effort, and it’s a buff to the tank arguably least in need of a buff in WT.

4 Likes

Yes, and that’s because I play each and every single MBT of each and every single nation (except Italy lol).

So all of these petty “bias wars” are beneath me. I don’t care about “Russian bias”, I don’t care about “Germany/Russia/Whatever suffers”, I don’t care about “I want my nation to be the best” because I am no “nation’s main”.

I look at every tank and its capabilities in every aspect and as a whole with the same eyes, and I only want true balance and realism across all of them. I don’t have any biases towards nor against any tank, I only want the best for all of them within realism and balance.

So no, I do not intend to pretend that buffing T-90M’s rate of fire by 0.1 seconds, or the Chinese ones by 0.5, is going to “break the game” nor that it’s a display of “unbalanced bias”. And no, I do not intend to pretend that the Leopard 2s need to have the fastest rate of fire like the Challengers or the Arietes either when they are superior in every other possible metric.

10 Likes

T-64A was already mid at 9.3, all the usual USSR MBT debufs + no LRF and lacking armor since most 9.3s can pen its UFP already

4 Likes

they(except 2a7v’s and strv 122’s) are suffering compared to other nato 120mm tank at the same br

Juega italia mano

image

atomic-nuke

4 Likes

Because the gap doesn’t exist or is more in favor of M1A2(s) with its 5s reload, so what do ya wanna do, argue that non-uparmored ones need to stay as they are just worse for no reason, or support nerfing M1s to 6s? :)

Nope, because that is why they are buffing the VT-4s.

Then they can buff Leo 2s to bring them in-line clearly.

1 Like

Reddit tier take

2 Likes

No, the take of someone who loves all tanks equally and doesn’t care about the petty “bias/suffering” contests of single nation mains who just want their favourite toys to be better than everyone else’s.

3 Likes

Its not the unbalanced bias that you are seeing, if anything I think the main crux of the point has gone over you.

These didnt need buffing at all, 0.1 or 0.5 seconds its irrelevant to its performance, what IS relevant is WHY they chose to do this when reports have ACTIVELY gone untouched for months/years.

DIRCM/LDIRCM over performing, untouched since last major update to name one crucial report. SPYDER and its awful radar underperforming etc.

I couldnt care for the 0.1s buff, I care as to WHY now

3 Likes

According to you.

2 Likes

ignore them, they have nothing but bias :)

The T-80 series now having a NATO-level 5 reload rate as a base reload rate:

a close up of a man with a beard says hello there

I just expect people to now stop downplaying Russian tanks saying they still suffer.

3 Likes

is there a possibility of increasing the rate of fire for Comet I? QF77 was supposed to a production that sacrifice firepower to enhance human-machine efficiency, but now in war thunder its rate of fire is even worse than Firefly’s 17Pdr

2 Likes

I’m arguing that they should prioritize the biggest gaps/imbalances, which the Leopard 2s supposedly suffering isn’t one of.

2 Likes

Also, given that you seemingly do care about sources and historical accuracy again now, could we perhaps make the belts on BMPT/BMPT-72 actually kill the vehicle?

Or do you still consider these to be ““external belts””:

BMPT interior video


Original-Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f1ky9THxqw&t=751s

brm_response

{88AE0DEF-46D1-47FF-A4AD-C970A34DCD6E}

grafik
{2E5E0F24-84D3-40D8-8694-633111031FD8}
Src.: Uralvagonzavod Brochure - BMPT “THE TERMINATOR” (EN)
Src.: Uralvagonzavod Brochure - БМПТ «ТЕРМИНАТОР» (RU)

“850rds in two belts” hmm, almost as if there are only two belts in total, which would mean that the “internal/external” separation doesnt exist (as it’d require stowage/external belts per gun, thus 4 belts total).

Weird how there’s also no ready-rack ingame either, isnt it?
Almost as if there arent any “external belts” afterall.

38 Likes

Sure would be a shame if it was nerfed in armour last update :p

well, I’m on this. or I should say, it shouldn’t be buffed so much at once.
small changes are better, and now we are surely on the way to fully loading buff