Revert ARB Bomber changes

Speaking of the He-100D-1, wasn’t the whole “wing is radiator” just a racing prototype?

I remember hearing how the actual D-1 model had a normal radiator because the “wing is radiator” proved too fragile in military testing, and the cooling system did not work if the plane was inverted. I also remember hearing how it had a nose mounted MG FF/M akin to the Bf-109F-1.

Wouldn’t be the first plane snail has completely gotten wrong.

We won’t see any of this implemented as long as the loud minority of people who cry only fighters get addressed.

Well then idk what else it could be. I only became aware of how tanky they are literally today when I happened to be respading some low tier Japanese props and it came up in team chatter. Back when I spaded the likes of the Sunderlands, Catalinas, Mariner, and H6K/H8K, all of them were made of total glass that would die in a light sneeze even from rifle-caliber MGs.

You are also a very small loud minority. 99% of the people who play air either play it for the big shiny at the end of the tree or play it to get CAS for GRB

1 Like

The ironic part is that my proposed removal of all autowin bleeds actually would help, not hurt them…

By taking out the autowin potential from CAS or bombing, fighter mains even like CommunistBalls would have on average more time in each match to finish their dogfights before needing to care about the other two objectives, and that’s assuming the absurdly rare case of not a single other person killing any ground or bombing unit. Which never happens.

1 Like

Neither loud minority is completely right here. The pissing war between the camps is frankly pointless.

1 Like

Don’t give them credit lol

Wanting the game to be improved and not see further degradation is not a minority position. Most folk have just given up on fighting for better given the treatment Gaijin gives those who want for better. The only camps here are “We want the game to become even less interesting” and “We want the game to develop into a more indepth product offering opportunities for everyone to enjoy”

I think I heard this when I visited a fancy Polish town in the mid-20th century, from guys with grey suits.

What did they also say… “Works means freedom” maybe?

No matter how far you run away from the problem, covering your ears.
The problem itself doesn’t just fade away by itself.

I don’t give a damn about 0 effort RP grind
Let us do effortful gameplay with 0 RP instead of it.

Is that too much to ask?
Being part of a team and contributing as much as you fighters do??

1 Like

Almost like there’s nuance to things

1 Like

Funny claim coming from someone who’s take on nuance is “Remove bombers from Air RB” unless you’ve somehow shifted to a sane take from that first post. But I doubt it.

I’ve quite literally offered to give us what we both want, but sure

play a fighter

Believe it or not, people want a proper PvPvE mode, not a pure PvE mode.

A lot of people are happy to see the World War mode being worked on, because that’s gonna provide a PvPvE experience, similarly people want a permanent ARB EC mode. Those modes have actual depth, unlike modern ARB

btw, just because the target of attackers and bombers is to destroy bases and AI targets doesn’t mean that they are somehow not part of the PvP part of the game. They still have to defend themselves against other players, if they want to win.

Removing bombers from Air RB is not what the side opposing you wants, sunshine. They aren’t opposed to PvP, they’re encouraging a broadening of scope of the PvPvE game mode.

like I said, 99% of people are playing to grind to the big thing at the top, and really do not care at all.

I literally suggested we get our own seperate modes you knob

“I am insisting on my own wants by splitting out bombers into a PvE mode in spite of the fact that’s not what people want but instead what I want”

It really impresses me how dishonest some of the people on this forum manage to be.

the entire crux of my point is that we get our own PvP mode and you get whatever you want exactly (I’m still not entirely sure). You have absolutely 0 critical thinking skills it is truely amazing

custom battles exist you should try that

1 Like

If you had the ability to parse information (aka critical thinking skills) you would grasp that people don’t want a separate mode. They’re interested in the current mode being fleshed out in a way that facilitates a myriad number of playstyles. A PvPvE mode, building from what currently exists towards the good of what used to exist. This is not hard to grasp, your insistence on not grasping it is ironically a demonstration of the lacking critical thinking skills you accuse me of, or incredible dishonesty. I’m leaning towards assuming dishonesty.

If you want your own mode, encourage them to introduce tournaments under the event tab, as evidently your want is divergent from the intended functionality of the current mode.