Responding to issues regarding dev server reports 13.12.2023

Still has wired Interaction with incoming darts at strange angles… I think that has something to do with gaijins Volumetric “Bandage” they like to use

Let’s see:
PMC287 missing at least 60g
CLARA missing KE protection
LFP should be 50mm
MUSS no 360°
MUSS is a lighthouse
MK 30 too inaccurate
AHEAD is trash
AHEAD doesn’t set fuse automatically
Basically all around the armor is too thin (multiple)

About 13-14 separate problems then iirc

8 Likes

They can make an entire “its fixed” article on the puma alone 😂😂😂

1 Like

Weird interaction?
On which part exactly

I agree that there is a lot of disagreement about D technology armors.
But then it would be reasonable to have at least the same protection as 122.
But now it’s less protective than 122. This is why I’m pissed off.

1 Like

Hello im wondering if you can tell me what line will the gripen c be going to be added to for the uk is it the phantom fgr2 first kine or after tornado fr3

Sideskirts. Scav(former techmod) and i tested it after the recent devserver update. Ill ask him if he has the recordings later.
But im talking about 90° direction changes of incomming shells.

Here my man but you still have to associate the letters

2 Likes

You mean like it allows penetration at angles it shouldn’t?
The 2A7 and PSO have that problem on the hull roof.
Base armor 100% ricochets but with the addon armor a pen is suddenly guaranteed

2 Likes

Equivalent protected as 122 with better optics and gun would be a massive upgrade…

Don’t forget the fact it should accelerate as good as a 2A4, cus currently it very much doesn’t.

There’s a reason why the top speed is 61kph now, after all.

2 Likes

Thanks!

1 Like

Yes. Remember back in the day the 90° ricochets of aphe shells into tanks when hitting optics etc? Like that.

They did something to the gearbox iirc, trading topspeed fire acceleration. Thats even mentioned on KMWs publications iirc

1 Like

Why the Gripen not in italian tech tree as well, as you said Hungary used the Gripen as well. If you don’t give Italy a good rank 8 aircraft how are you supposed to play against americans and russians?? #JusticeforItaly

1 Like

Yeah, no problem. isn’t it?
2A6, 122A, 122B, 122B+ deck is still better than 2A7V, 2PSO, 2A6, 2A5 deck.

In that case, why does the yak-141 get irst?

That is a balancing decision, the aircraft never flew with it yet it has it in game.

I don’t see how the whatever you’re going to name this thing’s turret spall liner is any different.

Because we have and will only ever have one variant of the Yak-141 in game. As we explained at the time, it has been given all of it’s planned features as it would have had for production. We do not plan further Yak 141 variants.

3 Likes

Maybe the Battle Rating (BR) of the aircraft should be increased to 13.0 so that aircraft such as the Mirage 3C, Shahak, Nesher, Mirage 5F, J35D, F104G China, F104J Japan, F1 Japan, Su-17 M2, F4F Early, and F4C, which currently don’t have flares, can have their own BR

#justiceforitaly yes please give italy good veichles