Also. No such tank exists anymore :P
Warrior should have a liner iirc
the Challenger 3 P we are getting isnt even a Prototype. its actually a Technology Demonstrator. its never meant to see combat.
wich is also probably why it dosnt have a spall liner. it didnt need it to show of the gun and stuff.
does it even armor lol
Yes it does. Even tho it is a TD, it is a fully functional tank
The Abrams series of tanks and most troop transports have a built in Kevlar spall liner that absorbs spalling. This is documented in several websites and articles and i think there are a few pictures of it around the web.
So are some of the 11.3s and premiums going to move up to 11.7 then? F4S/F4J is about to ruin 10.3 now that it wont see top tier and with so many Su-27s and F15s about to fill 12.7 bracket and pull 11.7s and 12.0s up these premiums need to move up otherwise 10.3/10.7/11.0 are about to get rekt by this absurd premium
For these two fighter jets, it is obvious that there is unfair treatment towards the Swedish JAS39A, as the locking distance of the AGM-65B equipped on the South African JAS39C is significantly longer than that of the RB75 (AGM-65A) equipped on the Swedish JAS39A, which would result in the Swedish JAS39A risking a greater risk of being shot down than the South African JAS39C in top-level land and air rooms to launch air-to-ground missiles, which is unfair. For the sake of fairness, either Sweden’s JAS39A will obtain AGM-65B in the same way as Japan’s F16 AJ in weapon configuration, or the AGM-65A/B carried by A and C will be removed. The South African JAS39C is definitely safer than the Swedish JAS39A in terms of the risk of being shot down. This is inconsistent with the announcement claiming fairness.
Oh this is the most minnor difference the A would have better performance please you got what you wanted
The aim7s right now tend to fly randomly away from the enemy your locking, they can explode if you loose lock for a fraction of a second unlike the er, and overally, the r27er tracks better, has twice the range of the sparrow, three times the speed of the sparrow if we are optimistic towards the aim7, and doesnt turn away randomly for no apparent reason. They may not be too difficult to dodge, but russia has been way overpowered in the radar missile stuff for a very long time now, both at closer and further ranges.
R27er has data link
And its faster
I dont care a tiny little bit of what it has, if the aim7m and f dont have it, add a later variant, because right now, they are pretty unreliable. Yes they may work a few times, but they dont come even close to the r27er, in fact, no radar missile in the game comes close to the r27er. Maybe aim7p, aim7mh, there must be something. Add an early aim120? (and the er would still be far better because of speed and range).
Yes we know
AMRAAMS will come next major then you can then moan about R77
So much for the short lived Russian Bias, am I right?
Yeah, knowing the dev team, they will expect us to counter the r77 with an aim120a, instead of the c variant or something actually competent.
The R-27ER also sometimes randomly flies towards a different direction even if you still have a good lock, and it doesn’t have twice the range of the AIM-7M (which is still a very good missile even if there’s better), that is just an exaggeration.
Add the AIM-7P and it’s still going to be worse than the R-27ER. If you hung yourself up on every little theoretical detail, you’re still going to complain.
Man, Ive killed targets on multiple ocassions further away than 50km with the r27er with relative ease, with the aim7m, even with lofting, it struggled to reach 30 km. That may not be twice the range but damn, its pretty close to it. Add a propper aim7 with data link, make them reliable and fix all the bs, and maybe people would not complain about a plane that doesnt even have TWS on the damn radar.
U sure about that?
İ managed to get 60-70km kills with my R27ER while 38Km was the best i managed to get with Aim-7M.
Thank you :)
R27er has more range and is faster
It newer then the Aim7m