What about the Type 10 Armor and Acceleration? This is something the Japan players broughtt up frequently.
3 Likes
Actually no. Sweden players are malding due to fact that SWE gets another filler plane that only purpose is to lengthen grind (like Viggen D).
The JA37D is eventually going to get AMRAAMs so I don’t think it’s a filler vehicle.
1 Like
Any news regarding the Leclercs?
1 Like
That’s great, I believe in AMRAAMs for everyone. Whenever they came. Right now its just filler.
1 Like
“The leo was my workplace” yet you talk like a salty 16 year old. Why don’t you prove you work there? Stop making stupid arguments. There is no way a Strv 122 can have better armor than one of most modern Leos.
“2 min google”
Nice source. I’ll stop replying because something is wrong with you and that’s bias.
How about the roadmap from earlier this year? I hope the rest of it is coming this winter.
You have no right to disrespect anyone like that, especially over a video game.
4 Likes
And so fighting also got here. How nice. If i got 1$ for every forum topic that ended in a pointless fight i would have at least 100$
I’m not disrespecting anyone. They are posting misinformation
Whilst this is fantastic news and that we are also getting spall liners… I do have some legitimate concerns that these reports are only now being looked into after we’ve gotten a premium Challenger 2. Many of these bug reports are 6 months to a year old. A few more than that. Im trying to not look a gift horse too closely in the mouth, but the timings do have me worried a little.
As for the data being contenious… considering all this data has been found with publicly available sources and no leaks have yet to occur is amazing work by the guys over in the other threads. With so much data classified, you cannot rely on primary sources all the time and you need to make reasonably estimations based upon available data. This would still see massive buffs for the CR2, though would still mean its underperforming compared to IRL
7 Likes
We’re still getting a joke of a 2A7 after getting a joke of a PSO?
2 Likes
Happy to be a part of the crew.
1 Like
Having two more missiles which don’t blow up after radar contact is lost is always better than having 4 missiles which blow up after losing the radar contact
(Reminder, US still doesn’t have 7MH or 7P with datalink)
Why does italy dont get the gripen from hungary?
The above. There has to be a point where developers accept we cannot prove everything definitively and infer it I’m looking at you TES ERA packs and then not botch its addition
most countries are scuppered because the material that explicitly proves it is redacted, restricted or classified.
2 Likes
Not ERA, NERA(chobham)/ERA sandwich. Yeah, we are in another point, again…
1 Like
Imagine if they give us something competitive right away, it would be fun
3 Likes
We also wanted to bring you some news regarding spall liners, this feature is now ready for the following vehicles: the Leopard 2A5, Leopard 2A6 (including the Finnish version), Leopard 2 PSO, Leopard 2A7V, Strv 122A, Strv 122B PLSS, Strv 122B+, Strf 9040C, Challenger 2, Challenger 2 (2F), Challenger 2 TES, Black Night, Challenger 2E, and Challenger 3 (P) — however, it’s only present in the hull for the CR3, as there is no lining in the turret in presentations and videos of the prototype.
8 Leo’s, 6 Chally’s and then the Strf 9040C thrown in there.
This list kinda feels like they found the things they could copy paste liners to in bulk.
Really hoping the rest come this patch and every other vehicle which has them isn’t gonna to be left at a disadvantage for a period of time.
1 Like