What about AH-129D which didn’t get such treatment upon the introduction? Will it be reverted to the first dev-server of “Kings of battle” condition?
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6ufEBjT1VymX
New report submitted. The report I submitted before was rejected on the grounds that it could only calculate optical zoom.
1 Like
You can try to make a bug report with this video, you may get something. Im not doing this one.
I will even give you more video
1 Like
im done making reports.
the last one i did was the LWS/MAWS report for the T129… and they couldnt really argue against it since i used Pics of an arms expo from this year.
My LOSAT reports with US documents were passed on and since then, nothing…
someone else can have the honors of making that report.
Well done. Thank you for listening to the community!
Credit where credit is due. I am a player from 2013, and I find that it’s innumerable how many times you’ve messed up in the past, but recently your transparency has drastically improved. I always felt you were very distant from the community until recently. Thanks!
1 Like
Can we use this video as a reason for them to give DM63 to the CR3 too? lol
If so can we get the R-73 for Yak-141
1 Like
When will we know what branch the Gripen C (SA) is going in the British Tech Tree?
Sorry fam, have to use multiple sources so it can be passed like Hull armor reports. ))))
Not the same situation
Im going to cry
Legendary.
Now heres hoping its real tangible explanations and how itll be done and not put off reasons why it wasnt/won’t change!
dap handshake
1 Like
My biggest gripe : rank VIII doesn’t seem to bring anything new to the table. It’s an incremental buff (at best ?) on existing tanks without anything exciting justifying all the buzz. It feels like “we need more money from players grinding”.
If you were really intent on bringing a game changing experience (like when late-to-post cold-war era tanks were introduced, along with stabs, thermals, IR-tracking, MAWR, LWR, laser rangefinding, helis, etc.) I’d at least expect modern-day tank technology : ballistic computers, lead indicators, etc.
I mean I know you could introduce those mechanics later but all that buzz and “rank VIII” introduction would be the perfect time to bring in new tech.
Right now every single showcased new tank is a rehash of “omg look at that protection against chemical rounds” (like HEAT is a thing at 9.3+ ?),
“look at those gen 2 thermals !” (yawn…),
and “oh look, a remote MACHINE GUN” omgomgomg !
“SPALL LINERS” … oh wait…
Don’t get me wrong, it’s nice that you care enough to adress the DU, spall liner issues, etc. but Gaijin needs to do a lot more to hype me up for the upcoming release of a whole new rank.
2 Likes
Now this is a propper way to engage !
Okay nice, thats very nice, but theres a question that its never answered. How is 6 r27er missiles balanced against 4 aim7 missiles? Also why not even a TWS mode on the F15 radar yet? I really really Hope this is not the final form of the F15 that we are getting on the update.
Does this mean CCRP now works with GBUs?
Because in practice SARH missiles are not difficult to dodge and you cancel out that 10 missile loadout advantage by killing the Su-27. It doesn’t invalidate your AIM-7’s effectiveness if your opponent has two more missiles.
1 Like