Forget it, it’s not worth arguing. You can continue to defend things that are destroying the game, I am not catching a ban just because I disagreed with a person of higher power.
Told, not shown proof. Anyone can say anything they want but without concrete sources it’s just an empty claim that will do nothing to change anything.
The floor has to be connected to the turrets rotation in some way or another since it follows the turrets rotation, if that is able to be disconnected somehow then great, show proof of that and create a report.
Have you not read through this thread?
1 Like
I assume the same applies to russian vehicles and their autoloaders. Or do the gunner and commander have to move around inside the tank? The autoloader is attached to the turret and the carousel spins inside it.
Please read all of my answers before commenting.
Of course not. A hit to the automatic loader means a hit to the ammunition.
The M1 Abrams series in-game currently loses all turret traverse // Gaijin.net // Issues
Unrealistic Turret Traverse Disable Mechanism: Turret Basket and // Gaijin.net // Issues
M1 turret fails to turn if ANY damage is done // Gaijin.net // Issues
Oh wow… almost like this has been reported and denied because somehow listing sources (aka LITERAL TECH MANUALS with all the information the website states we need to include) and I assume adding them (idk, can’t see as it’s above my “access level”) isn’t providing sources unless it deals with Russian equipment. I mean hell, mine was from over a year ago and was closed for “not including enough information” with the copy paste response (you know, this one: “Unfortunately you have not included all necessary data. Without it, it is impossible to resolve the issue. If you’ll encounter the issue again, please make a new report. The report should include description of the issue, steps to reproduce, unedited screenshots made by game, log and replay file. Screenshot should be made during the bug or immediately after it occurs.”). Funny how when it comes to fixing any non-Russian vehicles they magically get denied but then when nerfing comes, it can come off of people going “I feel like” like what they did when they nerfed the Fw 190 radial engine heating.
I wish but 9/10, the autoloader eats all spall or IFV rounds and protects the ammo
The two first reports you list both have similar answers, they list sources but do not provide them.
And yours i personally cannot see what files are attached either but i assume you did not provide all the files they ask for.
If you think a report warrants a second review you can use the report function on the bug report site:
1 Like
Funny seeing how they pick and choose when listing sources is or is not required, such as my TOW-2B report when they responded it was a “game convention” instead when it’s formated exactly the same.
Also, still banned on the website because they kept closing out a report when stating “not enough information” rather than saying it needed to be added as a PDF/downloadable. With that that report, I included the .clog and screenshots, the things requested of us on Gaijin’s website. To say that the bug reporters are just denying reports so they can avoid work is an understatement. If you want to argue against that, go ahead and explain how reporting how the T-72’s missing a properly modeled commander’s copula armor with screenshots of the tank with the hatch open to include entire tour videos from museums and explaining that borated poly (aka, plastic doped with boron) isn’t going to provide any KE protection isn’t a bug report. T-72 series missing commander’s copula armor // Gaijin.net // Issues,
Also, that second one literally gave multiple operator’s manuals. Actually, go read the report before responding trying to be smart about it.
2 Likes