nope
Ew
And thank you
“Even though they did everything right”
Then they probably didn’t do everything right
But you do want to penalize players who hit the ammo carousel of an autoloader, packed with explosive charges by just having it eat the round instead of popping like it should.
all this all still wrong hydraulic pump location
its the easiest thing to change
“Players who manage to land first shot shouldn’t be penalized”
Ammo and breech turning yellow, only 1 crew member getting knocked out from a 105mm, 6.4kg shell travelling at 1.5 km/s from a 19.4 second reload tank:
What feedback was listened to? Becuase obviously the ones that were bug reported and the first hand accounts were ignored? The way this is implemented is not historical. And how is the gun shield not armor? Part of the vertical drive???
I think I see the problem with implementing this on certain tanks. It’s going to nerf them specifically, when this DM should be game wide. The autoloader argument doesn’t hold water, as the autoloader provides a benefit, this is just an added weakness when it’s an already weakened tank.
Before, the entirety of the baskets were part of the damage model- now, only the floor.
I think it’s a fair middle ground, and definitely a compromise born from the feedback.
If Gaijin are going to continue to nerf Leopard 2s then why can’t we finally have the missing spall liners for the remaining Leos?
Leopard 2PL missing spall liners
The Leopard 2A4M still lacks spall liners.
Leopard 2 PSO missing hull spall liner
Or maybe teach new players the game mechanics with meaningful tutorials, instead of making the game more beginner friendy… If somebody makes a poorly aimed shot (for example way lower than where the crew is) they should be punished for that by not giving them “critical hit” and basically rendering the enemy vehicle out of the match.
Add DU to the Abrams, fix the turret ring, model the fuel tanks correctly and then nerf it, not nerfing it while it’s already bad and underperforming.
You saw the feedback
You saw nobody wants this
And yet you go ahead with it anyway.
Why does this always happen, without fail?
Are you somehow catching inverse meaning from what people say? “No” is never “Yes”
Yes lets add this to the worst performing nation in top tier GRB first. That makes sense.
it was sub 40% in January. lmaooo
The argument that they don’t want to “punish players who make the correct play” is hilarious. War Thunder is all about RNG. It has always been filled with moments where the Snail decides to punish the player even when they make the correct play. I will never forget the game where a T-80BVM swallowed TWO rounds of DM53 into its sides before finally noticing and deleting my 2A6. I rage quit for a couple of days after that!
Maybe Gaijin should fix stuff before adding more complexity to tank models?
You can use statshark now too
You asked what you did wrong, I gave you the answer, you got screwed by Gaijin with your shot then screwed yourself by reversing and turning side on, but actually re watching it you had a red barrel/ breech when you shot (I missed that the 1st time), so that’s another thing you did wrong, shooting with a damaged gun, most of the energy of the shot probably went into blowing up you own gun.
Learn to read context brother.
Also
Apparently still enough energy to knock out the ammo rack blast door though.
Ask specific questions if you don’t want general answers.
And yeah I think that shot should have spalled the driver at least but I don’t make gaijins damage models so all I can say is
If you want to speak of context, you asked to have your screw ups pointed out I said you screw ups where AFTER the shot… read between the lines.