Which brings me to the point that adding these turret baskets first to an already subpar MBT is the wrong decision :/
Due to player skill no doubt, both of those MBTs are far worse than the Abrams
on paper yes
And in practice, you cannot seriously tell me that a CR2 is better armoured and equipped than an abrams, come on now 🤦♂️
You can reliably pen all but the Leo’s frontally as far as I know
so youre saying because one of the major nations is too incompetent to hold their own they should get concessions? Because the weakspot on the front of an MBT being penned by small guns isn’t unsurprising in that spot
Are these your personal stats?
i mean chally suffer so i cant rlly say anything
I cannot reliably pen the front of the Russian tanks.
You have to remember how Gaijin interperts numbers. Remember when they said 48% for the APHE rework was a majority against 52%? Clearly a 38% win rate is a significant enough number that shows US tanks are over performing and need this massive nerf.
Leo frontal armor exclude the 2A7V version are all paper
LFP beckons for you my friend
No, overall for the vehicle across the player base and what the database has.
Yeah except when the M774 hits a T-72 right in the auto loader and doesn’t detonate until 2 more shots or it the T-72 turns and shoots me.
compare the average players you get playing britain and Italy to the average America main, because the abrams is objectively better in every way to them
I have a video of the driver of the abrams eating a 152mm APFSDS in the arm, then going through the gunners legs, and into the commanders foot.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Clearly not what the data says.
It’s often missed that they probably didn’t have ammo there my friend. Look closer, it happens to everyone. A lot of USSR players bring 16 or less rounds to not get detonated easily
Or if I dump 32 hydras into its side with the LAV and the ERA eats all of them somehow? I know it’ll eat couple but all?