Both of them also have range finder which all their 6.7 lacks,
The Panther F on 6.0 already has a range finder. Which, by the way, has no effect compared to an Ass Crew.
Only the LRF have a decisive effect on the game.
1 Like
The way they have done it is incredibly stupid…
1 Like
most people have bad crews in that rank. The range finder definitely helps. I dont see how your statement makes any sense tbh
Sure lmao “way more powerfull”
Meanwhile R2Y2 that are gonna get removed at 8.0 basically whole br above its flight performance and combat effectiveness.
hes obviously not talking about the r2y2 at all
Title says “removed vehicles”. - hes talking about removed vehicles in general
Is the R2Y2 removed?
I don’t think they should be removed from everyone’s accounts. There are those who really enjoy them, and removing their favourite vehicles would not go down well.
I believe they should be made available every now and then - perhaps à la Maus, or available to players on the anniversary of their game accounts.
I would personally love to see them back; the Tiger II 10.5 cm is very much my holy grail of War Thunder.
7 Likes
Will be in matter of few months. Everyone talks about it recently if you havent noticed. Worth reminder they gonna be removed and talking about them is definetly point on topic.
I very much do not agree with their removal nor do I agree with other vehicles removal nor do I like event vehicles in general since often they are nearly impossible to get after the event ends. I dont really see why have event vehicles that only small % of playerbase can enjoy and people that gonna start playing after the event or vehicle removal have no way of getting it.
But there is simply nothing gaijin can do about it now since such things were feature for years. Since then it would be unfair to ones that have them.
1 Like
Not sure if you missed this or just simply didn’t bother to include it, but it has a much better UFP too.
In the case of inaccurate modelling like on panther 2 I say keep the old one for people that acquired it but only remove it when you’ve built an accurate replacement
For unbuilt vehicles such as HO RI and ostwind 2 (yes the ostwind 2 counts as it was never built at all), they Should either be removed entirely whether there is a replacement or not or kept in and other unbuilt tanks should then be allowed. the excuse gaijin used for keeping the HO RI is lazy and unfair to other nations
completely fake tanks should be removed.
What was their excuse>?
No.
Also a no. The Tiger II (H) at 6.7 is better.
Also sits a whole 1.0 higher.
2 Likes
That they will only remove it once there is an adequate replacement.
Knowing damn well there’s no other Jagdtiger like TD that can be added to japan so it would have to be an artillery SPG at the same BR to take its spot, in other words the Type 99 which is already in the game at the same BR
1 Like
Jealousy looks bad on you
4 Likes
Of course the antique range finder helps.
But it is not so powerful that it turns a WW2 tank into a post-war tank on BR 7.3.
Especially since the same range finder can be found on a BR 6.0 tank.
Or do you think the Panther II and Tiger 2 10.5 are better off on BR 7.3?
I have the Panther II myself. And it fits perfectly where it is.
And that’s why it’s on BR 7.0 and not 6.0.
Do you seriously think the Panther II belongs in BR 7.3?
Not saying that, just pointing it out.
100mm sloped is definitely better than 80mm sloped.
It’s more reasonable that it’s a whole 1.0 different to the Panther F with that in mind.
OK. I misinterpreted your post.
In fact, I find the Panther II’s excellent reverse gear to be the most significant difference.
It drives almost like a modern tank with a WWII turret.
1 Like