When I said that M18 is immortal, if used correctly, I meant that if you play it correctly, the enemy will never even have a chance to kill you. You will assassinate him, without him realizing what’s happening. I even said that the enemy will be dead or disabled, before he can fire a shot. You can’t die, if you don’t get shot in the first place.
Then this guy says that M18 can’t bounce any shells and I’m just coping.
I am truly speechless. I just don’t want to argue anymore, if these are the things I have to explain.
It is very much possible. M18 is an outstanding tank, it’s a very fast with a very good gun for a scout tank. It’s not big, has a 50 cal, but the operating commander is very easy to kill, and you can scout people, but why would you, if you have the 76mm. If you play it correctly, you will never get shot. Unless CAS wants you bad, but CAS doesn’t spare anyone.
It’s not possible in a literal sense, as in you can’t lob shells like artillery in WOT.
You’re just arguing for the sake of arguing. Of course nothing is immortal. The point is that things like M18 can utilize it’s strengths to the fullest, while when heavy tanks are allowed to do that, everyone is malding.
No one considers M18 to be OP, just because it can be a sneaky assassin, it’s pure nonsense, but when a heavy tank is about to become tough to kill, everyone screams stop.
I only pulled stats, because you did. I’m not gonna be a sucker and take shit from you for being bad, when most of you are worse than me.
Btw when talking with the @ULQ_LOVER the discussion starts and ends on the stat check, after that there’s no reason to talk to him, he already made up his mind.
Because you’re asking for a downright unbalanced gameplay. Go make a game yourself if you think historical MM is the way to go, even though historical matchups are inherently unbalanced. Do you wanna face the M1A1 HC in your T-55/T-72A?
I’m asking for balance between historical accuracy and game balance. Right now balance is not more important, it’s the only thing that matters.
You’re the ones who come up with strawman arguments. Every single time historical accuracy is mentioned, you immediately come up with some horribly unbalanced scenario. You can think only in black or white, yes or no, good or bad.
