Yes, you can see the enemies, but they can see you too (tho germany mains are blind here too). You have pen indicator (that you should not rely on, because many times it just lies), but they have it too.
the mobility buff is nice, but it isn’t that much as peole think. I’d say the buff on turret traverse is much better.
You are not limited to 3.3 planes. You have both Spitfire at 5.7 and Mustang aswell.
The last time i see someone saying something like this was talking about KV-85 and IS-3 BRs so lets start thinking this monstruosity more sooner than later are going up.
The only downgrade for the M51 is you are usually teamed with the trash allies teams in this BR are braindead.
Are you saying you can’t play ground, you have to play brainless CAS to get kills? (Not you but who you replied to) it’s a great help, but if that’s your crutch for the whole match, you probably need to switch to be an Aircraft Main. Don’t understand why your fighting this so hard.
That reply wasn’t to you. Yes, I speak English. If you would have read the marker on the top to see who I replied to, you would notice it doesn’t say you. I did respond to you, over a different topic, and not even about you, but who you were quoting. I hate to be that guy, pulling up player stats and all, but your profile says you’ve played 15 matches.
Seems like a really “balanced” match, in which four players are responsible for 40 kills lmao. Any vehicle can show amazing performance in a wild match like that, so using that as a “proof” of something isn’t really great.
So, please explain me, if the M-51 is so OP, and strong, and everything, then why is your K/D only a slightly over your average K/D at rank 4 (only counted reasonably sufficient battles, and i left out those that you have only played a couple games, because it is not indicative of the tank’s performance. I also left out SPAAs).
Both if we compare it to the K/D averages, and their median, and geometric median…
It is also closer to the smallest value than to the largest.
Your avg K/D at rank 4 with is 2.7. Your K/D with the M-51 is 2.78. So the difference is 0.08! Your performance with that tank is basically average compared to the other tanks you play at that rank, so, please, explain me, if the tank is so good, why you can’t have a much better K/D with it?
I left a note on one of them. I compared your performance to the M4/T26, with which you have a much better K/D, and it is the same BR, as the M-51, yet you don’t cry on the forums that it should be moved up…
Anyway, i am waiting for your next strawmen “argument”.
For the sake of completeness, here are the calculated K/D values that i used:
For me, the fact that they raise the Br of the M51 is due to the fact that it is from the 60s rather than because it is effective in the Br, since the HEAT ammunition is too underperformed and does very random damage.
That is what happens when a damage model is designed that needs many improvements, but instead of updating it so that it works correctly they leave it as it is, and what is worse, they base the balancing of the tanks on that wrong damage model. and extremely obsolete, good when all tanks used APHE but completely absurd when the other types of projectiles were added, a real nonsense.
That is not true at all. You can play with even the most lightly armored tanks, you just need to be good.
You can also “hide” in that mode, name tags don’t show up always, and you’d be suprized how many players are completely blind and deaf in that mode too.