On a side note, I’ve already played the M1A2 SEP on the U.S. side. What I really hope is for the U.K. to get the M1A2K as well—I don’t want to be stuck with the Challenger 2 anymore, except for the Black Night (and I’ve already used the Challenger 2E and 3).
1 Like
Really wish they added the sepv3 it was literally the perfect opportunity. Now China gets basically the same top-tier tank but better because of the lower profile crows. Such a missed opportunity by the devs, they literally shot them selfs in the foot. I guarantee you the backlash they are getting right now would of not been as bad if sepv3 was added alongside the M1A2T even though China should not have even gotten it in the first place.
1 Like
Chally 2 experience
1 Like
Anyway, let them add the M1A2T, the tank is mediocre anyway. What bothers me more is that they gave CIRCM to all Apaches, even though CIRCM is only installed on a few helicopters. At the same time, American F-18s are not allowed to have additional pylons with BOL, Swedish F-18s are not allowed to carry AGM-65 Maverick, and German Phantoms are not allowed to carry more than 2 Mavericks. And there are countless examples like this.
1 Like
To be more precise, the PRC (China) doesn’t have the M1A2T—only the ROC (Taiwan) operates it. And Taiwan is an unofficial U.S. ally in the Asia-Pacific region, rather than being part of the “China” governed by the PRC.
It would be more appropriate to move him to the rear of the American M1A1HC.
5 Likes
And this is the perfect example of why I’m against copy paste in the first place.
The US tree doesn’t exist to prop up weak foreign trees.
5 Likes
I also play as a German too. Before the Swiss F/18s joined the air force, the entire air force only had six AGM-65s XD
This, THIS needs to be said. For years America was just a band aid for other TT at the expense of the US TT. Let america have their vehicles in peace without 60 different nations getting them. Same for germany as well, they fall under the same treatment (2A7HU).
1 Like
In fact, the US Air Force’s F-15, 16, and 18 can be found in Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, France, Japan, Israel, and China, while the German Army’s Leopard 1.2MBT can be found in Italy, France, and Sweden.
And most of them are better than the models from the country of origin.
That’s just not viable; America exports a lot of military hardware, and other nations purchase them.
They’re literally due their own vehicles.
2A7HU was due to Italy due to it belonging to one of their subtrees.
America will have their own exclusive (F-22A) vehicle soon enough. Patience.
4 Likes
Well the AH64E with DCIRM is exclusive to the US irl but no everyone gets it next update.
Because there aren’t any other options for said nations, and it’s compatible with the airframe & software, as per gaijin’s standards for addition
They’re compatible, and Gaijin has already stated that it doesn’t really matter if they have them, but if they can use them.
Hence why the SU-30MKM may carry 38MTs.
Or the Rafale C F3 may carry 8 MICAs and HMD…
The UK does not field an Abrams. They should not get an Abrams, yet people in this post are asking for the UK to get an Abrams.
The US also didn’t give its equipment to foreign operators expecting to fight them.
The US also doesn’t give foreign operators better variants of its own equipment.
You can’t cherry pick the parts of reality that fit your argument.
Ah i see, ok so we gimp and nerf american vehicles just so other nations have things they dont need that they never had? Makes sense, who needs balance anyway right? I mean why doesnt everyone get an Abrams ATP, matter of fact lets throw in the HSTVL since we just want to fight in a swamp of copy paste at top tier.
1 Like
There’s tons of UK vehicles in other trees and the only pushback I hear is about the UK not getting a revenge class, nothing about worrying about the UK’s uniqueness.
Almost every nation is used to prop up another yet they all still have thier unique vehicles, just like the USA will
2 Likes
Australia fields an abrams, where is australis a subtree of??? Ohh right britain, so britain gets an abrams.
This is a tale as old as time and has been the case since subtrees were created, literally nothing new
Australia is not an official UK sub tree.
People are asking the British to get Australia, which in turn operates the Abrams, as far as I’m aware.
I fail to see your point here.
I also don’t understand this; a domestically upgraded aircraft… is better than its baseline variant.
Shocker.
They weren’t given better variants. They made it better, I.G. Israel.
2 Likes
Hmm that’s weird, because all American top tier aircraft excluding the F14 are able to carry BOL pods yet it took 2 years for one to be seen and its on the F15C late. Explain why Finland and other nations get these while the United States which uses similar if not the same systems cant use them. They are compatible, this is the same logic no?
1 Like