I guess the FA-18A and AF-18 ceased existing then?
You absolutely wouldn’t survive being a Germany main with the Leopard 2 situation.
it’s not even that deep.
It’s an Abrams. It’s not even that good.
I promise you’ll get over it.
Tell me you dont know what your talking about without telling me you dont know what your talking about.
Both Canada AND Australia arent sub trees.
Literally all aircraft capable of using remotely modern US missiles can carry, it’s up to gaijin who actually gets them
What about the Kuwaiti Desert Warrior and the M1A2K (I’m just giving an example; it’s not in the game)?
Technically correct as they form the commonwealth, which has been confirmed by gaijin to be a suntree for britain over the future
I don’t know. I’m not a developer.
Bug report that and see where it goes.
The F-15CGE also didn’t have BOLs at first during the dev server, IIRC? Take with a grain of salt; I may be hallucinating here.
They never should have been added to the UK tree.
I cant wait in a year to have battles against 5 leopards 4 abrams 6 T80s and couple boxer ifvs at top tier. Its going to be so much fun.
Should probably stop branding this game as realistic if this game goes down the route you want it to be. ATP, its no better than WOT with random half way existing vehicles fighting each other on mixed matches.
1 Like
What about the Qatari EF-2000 being added to the US tree?
Royal Saudi Air Force ?
Wtf ever happened to nations being unique? like specifically looking at this, China, a rival superpower to the usa, gets an abrams…why tf would anyone ever play the usa? Like its all copy past from ww2 to the modern era. Every other nation gets on par if not better usa equipment so like??? When are we gonna see the abrams in the french, british, and italian trees due to subtrees?
Like if there are no more vehicles to put in a tree that are unique to the main nation, then the TT is done.
No sense in forcing nations to keep up with others at the expense of gameplay
1 Like
But it is realistic; much of the world’s modern military is straight up copy-paste
Military hardware is prolific and sold to a lot of countries, said countries who in turn become subtrees.
And even then, there are arguably better places to draw the line at the designation “realistic” other than copypaste.
1 Like
This is only half true, nations still make their own vehicles.
Both would be fine. Maybe we can even get the Meteor first? That would be cool.
1 Like
Sure. That doesn’t disprove what I said.
1 Like
The truth behind the sub-technology tree: They didn’t want to create a vehicle that could only be deployed within one country.
This is like being able to give AS90, but distributing M109A1 instead.
I agree, I’ve heard enough. give the USSR our thousands of trophies; we want CV90s, Bradleys, Abrams, STRVS 122s, Leopard 2A5s, 2A6s, 2A4s, Marder IFVs, etc.
I get that, but still. We have shermans in every TT basically. With p47’s, f18’s, Any American artillery system in most TT’s. It’s just sad That theres really no other vehicles other than the fckin poster boy of american tanks to be given the Copy paste treatment. Especially when there not given to allies
1 Like
For reference here, UK vehicles in other trees via purchase/aid/co development/capture include Mark V, Spitfires, Hurricanes, Hampdens, Meteors, Churchill’s, Gladiators, Wellingtons, Lancasters, Hunters, Hunt class, Revenge class, Valentines, Vampires, Charioteer, Mosquitos, Tempests, Sea Hawks, Tornados, Typhoons, Centurions, Fireflies, Matilda 2, Vickers MK E, Crusader, River class and 70ft vosper class.
I love playing as UK vehicles as well as learning about them and while I don’t think every last one is necessary, I ain’t demanding other nations vehicles.
2 Likes