they probably made this inaccurate to balance the game as thailand fails to do thier developer supposed job to enhance japan in most br´s. And maybe its also a test how good the missiles actually are since japanese tanks and russian tanks are pretty different
oh well… my take to this situation is don’t bring up politics in this game, let japan have the VT-4, and let china have the M1A2T, the VT-4 isn’t even a majorly good vehicle that would make japan overpowered, so china will get the better end* of it anyways… so it’s stupid that politics are brought into a video game that will probably not exist within 10 years and everyone will forget abt it
So for balance sake would they add meteor to American f35 as it was the one tested it and aim 120d is not better than meteor? But i am for SU-30 MKM to get kh38 so that Russians can also feel how rest of us feel (Also no this does not mean i want meteor for US i just want to give an example)
The people here cannot comprehend this despite there being a Vietnamese & Iranian vehicle in US and a PL leo2 in Germany, because to the core that’s not what it’s really about. It’s about needing the game to have my side of patriotism because screw everyone else.
2 Likes
that and the document that you provided earlier
I need find more good quality picture .wait me
take your time. I would write the report in 30 to 40 min
just give them vt4 since its not china’s victory day now. idk why it’s worth arguing. adding is literaly better than removing.
all in all it depends on whether gaijin want or not, maybe there’s not deep politics factor but only “hey they jp players already have su30 which means they will have much in this update so lets be lazy”
1 Like
i found it form Taiwan Ministry of National Defense pdf M1A2T
LINK:https://www.mnd.gov.tw/NewUpload/202203/2-M1A2乘員席位配置及數位面板與彈藥說明1110308_385671.pdf
1 Like
The M1A2T has a KEW-A2 because you can’t prove it can’t shoot. Similarly, the Challenger 2 doesn’t have an L28A1 because you can’t prove it can shoot.
1 Like
never overestimate gaijin’s decision, some of them are just, typically silly, and no “bussiness rational”
We Chinese have a saying, “covering one’s ears while stealing a bell,” and I think this phrase perfectly describes Gaijin’s new flag system because it is utterly meaningless. Chinese forums often mock how players can even replace the Stars and Stripes with the Iranian flag or swap the Soviet flag with the Russian imperial flag. We never stopped Thailand and Japan from being together, nor did we oppose providing the VT4 tank for the Thai tech tree. The only thing we object to is Gaijin’s repeated attempts to confuse concepts by trying to add a vehicle that has nothing to do with Japan into that abstract faction everyone knows is meant to represent Japan—just like with the Su-30MKM.
3 Likes
In reality I doubt the VT-4 was even coming for Tusk Force in the first place. Sure it was leaked, but so was Object 640, so was VN-1C, etc. etc.
Looking through the namemap, the only mention of the Thai VT-4 that I could find was skins.
Thats it. Unless I missed something, the Thai VT-4 was nowhere near implementation.
》Its probably planned for a future update, since Gaijin never denied it nor did they say that there were no plans for it.
3 Likes
well since when is the f35 ingame(dont bring the danish draken). I just think its not the worst decission to test it this way with how broken the kh38 actually is. ( there was alot of drama about the recent ussr winrates and so on…)
I would like to apoligize about it. I should have cleared about that that. I meant when f35 added in future
So, were all those who opposed it at the time foreign anti-China elements (even if it was just a rumor that they were going to join)?
At the same time, they most often say that this is just a game, and why should you care so much about politics?
2 Likes
It was found in a datamined a while back but the Russian players threw a fit because it was captured and then gifted to the us as apposed to exported
Please show me what indian vehicles have something in common or to do with Great Britain.
Or Belgian F16s for France. Or Swiss Mirage, F5E or Hornets for Germany. Hell germany even has a swiss hunter as a squadron vehicle that is better than the british hunters and neither has anything to do with german airforce.
Subtree vehicles can range between similar/same vehicles already present in the TT (Strv 122 and fin 2A6 or Strv121 and fin 2A4) or unique vehicles not present within said TT (so many to pick, belgian or norwegian F16s, swiss hornets, pakistani hinds, Oplot, Jeff17, etc.)
this is very wrong, given that the Thai TT is part of the Japanese TT by proximity the chinese community HAS opposed that. Thailand doesnt have enough vehicles (modelled or irl) to warrant their addition as standalone nation. (Examples like Italy and Israel started as parts of previously existing TT, germany and USA respectively)
we all know what you object to, its kinda hard not to notice when you get very vocal about it every time something happens. The only thing i agree with the chinese community on is that the representation of some chinese vehicles is less than stellar and theres plenty of bug reports on that, what i dont agree with however is this inherent need to gatekeep their or other nations export vehicles to be added to the game, if it means it will be within tech tree of the big boogieman Japan. Its just childish
Also just for the record, i dont really care if china has M1A2T in it. Its not going to really change much one way or another and Taiwan/China use it so meh.
4 Likes
some says the “leak” itself is sometime a ragebait. actually i mostly agree this.
i remember J10C has its texture for a verrrrrry long time but not added until now