This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I didn’t knew the was a way to play War Thunder on third party website filled with numbers. Quite a good amount of forum snobs defending reds sure love their statistics, unless you suggest that due to high discrepancy of player number/skill level these numbers do not represent reality. Mfw Merkava 4m is better than Strv 122B+ and T90m2 according to the stats. It’s also sure is fun to see them justify when T-series’s armor for historical reasons but other tanks shouldn’t get their armor modeled because that’ll ruin the balance. Mfw tank hull designed in 1962 in a cave, even by those years standard, performs worse than modern tank expected and designed throughout years specifically to fight against a singular tank platform. Lmao.
2 Likes
No 122B+ has better stats despite having 2 times more played games.
Are we playing same game here ?
Can you elaborate ? This makes 0 sense.
1 Like
Another one who doesn’t know meaning of word “meta”
1 Like
It’s hypocrisy, Russia gets the best that it has, while rest of nations still use outdated darts. Truly an alien concept where game that claims to have good tank representation should represent nations equally. Even WoT doesn’t do that.
1 Like
These stats you’re bringing are an argument for the logic that gaijin balances game around game balance, and yet they make pages long post stating that Abrams hull is poo poo and Americans are stupid. Where is the same scrutinization to reds? If the reds are so bad then why do people complain? From where does it come from? You don’t hear people saying France or Italy is OP. Why then if it’s so bad do majority of playerbase play it and perform well? Why people are complaining against steamrolling by reds? “But the statistics say it’s bad” oh yeah sure, i sure am wrong when SIDE of T90 absorbs my M338. And what’s your excuse for lack of turret basket? “Oh we didn’t make it yet”??
1 Like
Jep the Relikt eats many darts for breakfast. The 5 sec. reload on the leclerc compensate that problem a little bit, but oh boy that doesnt help you against a BMPT.
1 Like
Well sometimes it was what agenda political leadership had like with IT-1 Khrushchev heavy love of missile tanks.
Surprise surprise, history is inappropriate according to the moderation team. My posts got removed. Thou shall not suggest that communism was bad.
No you just have skissue both in game and in history.
4 Likes
Nah your posts just have very little to do with the topic at hand.
1 Like
Were they tho? It was a detour for sure, but i was making a point about how red armor is treated differently to the rest of nations despite going against all logic and reason. As if faulty statshark statistics wasn’t a detour enough.
Haha. Quite ironic coming from belove average and blaming it on communism.
Yes? The history of the failures of communism in general doesnt really matter in a discussion about a buff for ERA in a video game.
If you want to add historical context then try to stick to the history of ERA.
2 Likes
Also you misrepresenting my points.
That wasn’t my point, my point was that it’s insulting to assume that the west has no armor but relikt is this super solution which nobody else uses, but at the same time the ammunition against it is, abd probably will never be, added. But you’re right, this is more for “abrams hull” forum
All what you said was T-series was made in communism so it must be bad. Which is not proof with verifiable data.
A waste of my neurodivergence this is, if one cannot grasp anything past first paragraph.