It don’t matter I gave you proof in a real match lmao this is just cope
5 Likes
No, no, no. Not in a match. Random non-penetrations happen there, or the server sometimes fails to register a hit. Those are random occurrences that happen maybe once every hundred battles. I’m not denying that. Show me, in the hangar, the Abrams’ fuel tanks stopping rounds the same way the T-90M’s do. Ok?
1 Like
But this is a universal issue tho? the leclerc has the same problem with the fuel tank absorbing all the spall (argueably the only survivability it has)
Show it in the hangar.
Its a universal issue with all fuel tanks, it does however depend on how the fuel tanks are placed and what they are coded as. What the other guy is probably refering to is that the Abrams fuel tanks are separated from the crew via a 9mm plate which can spall on its own after the initial spall got eaten by the fuel tank. The Leclerc doesnt have a plate separating the tank so when the fuel tanks eats all spall then theres nothing creating any new spall but its an internal fuel tank so it can detonate. The T90M combines the best of both worlds since the fuel tanks are separated not by armor but by spall liners so the fuel tank can eat spall, no new spall will be created and since the tanks are coded as external they cant detonate the way the Leclercs can.
Of the leclerc or the Abrams?
So that is by design better then and has nothing to do with relikt
2 Likes
Idk why forums breaks after you attach like 2 files.
2 Likes
2 Likes
Yep, has absolutely nothing to do with relikt.
I don’t know—maybe I’m speaking a different language. Why are you showing this? What for?
Hmm
Maybe he’s showing that the ‘T-90M’ bias that you’re experiencing is a universal issue
1 Like
Great. I support that. Let him show the Abrams tanking shots with its fuel tanks the same way.
Just shoot the hull corner, the weakspot is right there…
lfp and drivers port?
turret ring?
5 Likes
Great. Show me.
?
short for transmission
custom localisation
4 Likes
Ahhhh. Target pixels. LOL