It was yesterday. Poor pathetic T-90M
T-90M aka The Shoot Once Die Tank.
I don’t play very often these days, but whenever I do, it’s the same thing every battle — Relikt can’t be penetrated. Then, of course, the BVM or T-90M just shoots me and kills me.
The game has turned into some kind of joke.
The game has turned into a role-playing game where you roll the dice for a chance to penetrate Relikt.
Gaijin, are you guys okay? Why did you buff an already bugged armor?
2 Likes
Sorry, but here Relikt isn’t the problem… The fuel tank absorbed the dart and btw this happen with M1 too. It’s problem with fuel tanks in general.
Even if the fuel tank does not absorb it, it will just go out the other side of the fuel tank with no spall. I’ve shot the same area with M829A3 and it went cleanly through the fuel tank, then between the gunners ass and autoloader without hurting either.
Okay, now show me the same thing with an M1.
Omg. Gaijin, Are you serius?
This wasn’t happening before the patch. They buffed the T-90M’s armor, yet they refused to give the Abrams its lower front plate armor, citing some documents. Isn’t that Russian bias?
1 Like
Other tanks
Fuel tanks in general have that problem… not just the russian
No, no. I don’t need a compilation from the last 10 years. Just show me, in the hangar, that the Abrams can tank shots with its fuel tanks. Okay?
2023. You serious?
1 Like
How does the date of the video change the facts?
If there’s a gun hanging on the wall in the first act, it must go off by the third
Even a broken clock is right twice a day
Once every five years, you fail to penetrate an Abrams. Meanwhile, in almost every battle, I can’t penetrate the T-90M’s fuel tank, spall liner, or side Relikt armor. Do you see the difference?
One guy wrote a very long comment about how people justify the bias in the game.
One of his points was exactly what you’re doing.
He said that whenever someone complains, they’ll pull up a compilation of clips from the past 10 years and claim, “See? It happens to everyone.”
True, still raises the question tho why on earth the T90s fuel tanks are external.
Something, something… I dont like your arguement, so I call it invalid.
@H_ngma It’s a head scratcher… and definitely reported as a bug
1 Like
You said the M1 has the same kind of fuel tank. Then show me, in the hangar, the M1 tanking a top-tier round with its fuel tank. Please.
They say external but are actually labeled as either External or protected fuel tanks. Gets the protected status because they wrapped the entire thing in spall liner irl.
Yeah i know that the protection is the reason but its still kinda convenient that a spall liner is enough to stop a fuel explosion while the Abrams for example gets another armor plate that creates its own spall.
I don’t think the spall liner stops the explosion. I would not doubt for a minute that they have the fillers that are for fire/explosion mitigation modeled, causing that feature.- Either that or black magic
I mean they probably have something, im not even denying that (not that fuel explosion should be a common thing on modern MBTs anyway especially for ones running on diesel) but it is so inconsistent once again. Im pretty sure the French also did something to make their fuel tanks not explode under their asses instead of going “oui our fuel tanks are extra flammable we need something to light our cigarette on hon hon hon”.