The USSR has superior firepower against unarmored NATO tanks.
At the same time, even the most powerful APFSDS shells are not capable of penetrating the side of a Soviet MBT.
And the same would lilely be true if you gave Britain or France a T-80BVM. But even with perceived poorer quality players the BVM is performing well.
1 Like
And the only top tier META Russia has right now is aircraft and SPAA
1 Like
Oh, this starts…
It’s not like we have russian tanks given to minor nations? Oh, well we do. So let’s see how not “poorer quality players” perform in op russian tanks
“Exceptional” results for tanks that can
2 Likes
I guess I have to repeat myself…
not to mention that the angle of attack with the M829A2 is 68 degre and on the 3BM60 is only 47 degree…
Tell me honestly, are you a bot?
Why did I come to the conclusion that you’re a bot? You can’t watch videos and only rate them based on previews.
Whoever proves me wrong is a bot.
Have you watched the video?
I have a suspicion that this is SadRIPer alt account… it sound very much like him…
1 Like
Spoiler
Spoiler
Are you sure you’re not a bot?
Firepower is dictated by reload and round
Most NATO nations have superior reloads as well as rounds.
Therefore Russia has the better firepower.
Can you explain your “logic” please?
1 Like
You really don’t get how bad your showcasings are huh?
1 Like
NATO tanks have to aim for weak spots on Soviet MBTs. Soviet tanks, on the other hand, don’t need to aim for weak spots and can simply shoot at the NLD or the center of the silhouette.
You’re talking about armour here, not firepower
Nice
What nonsense? Firepower determines whether you can penetrate the enemy’s silhouette or not. The Russians have better firepower because they’re playing against cardboard NATO tanks with no armor.
German main syndrome
“If I cannot lolpen my enemy, my stuff sucks”
This looks like great armour for sure, I see no green at all
T-90M is better off here but still the same weakspots.
Grow up, learn to put a tiiiny amount of effort into your shots and aim for spots that you can easily pen.
5 Likes
no he doesn’t
1 Like
I mean, they get an auto loader which isnt impacted by crew health or loss… with a reload rate of 6-7.1 seconds without needing to spade… and again isnt reduced by damage
It can still turn and fire a return shot if its auto loader is taken out… unlike western mbts.
And you have massive amounts of armor to compensate - but russian players try to play their tanks like they’re a go kart and wonder why they explode. In every single frontal or angled damage simulation your green map of weak points is smaller than EVERYONE else.
Also you have an atgm that has 700-800mm of pen depending on the tank… that out performs every other mbt dart by miles, and if they want anything like it they beed to bring an IFV with zero armor and try to use it.
So yeah, you got fire power and armor.
1 Like