Relikt Armor Buff

This applied for all the people whos been defending RU vehicles on this forum, They just wanna keep this META AS IS at the end of the day

Everytime, the argument started is when the DEVs push the game to another difficulty to grind/enjoy

Tell me if you are happy when they added new vehicles? I guess you do for like 3 seconds and then, it came back to the gameplay mechanic which is a massive cock-blocking.

Obviously, nobody is happy because Gaijin only focus to make the grind harder to get more money without making the game fair and fun

Not necessarily, ive seen many that just go “yeah russia players are just better that is why they perform this good” so that nuanced take is actually nice to see.

I mean yeah if my main tech tree was this broken id have little motivation to change that either.

Depends on the vehicle to be honest. I had a lot of fun when Gaijin added the new SPAA and CAS was finally not the destroyer of worlds anymore. Ofc they had to ruin it just one update after with the war crime that is LDIRCM.

Have you seen people with good-faith conversation on this forum? They just went on ego, troglodyte mode and dis-credit everyone.

And Gaijin do what they do best - “Not enough info” “Not a bug” “Its a game convention”

never said that…

Yeah a couple to be honest.

Ah i just thought, because you specifically mentioned

on the US side

It so funny how you didn’t care about spawnes when was comparing something fitting to you but the moment I mentioned Chinese Abrams you started whataboutism.
OK, I counted all chinese abrams respawn and kills for last 4 months


Screenshot_20260610-171130

Seems like abrams is held by it’s playerbase
And like I said: better performing abrams outperforms better performing Russian tank and worse performing abrams outperforms worse Russian tank

2 Likes

T-series are well armored, there is no argument there, mid firepower (good round but bad gun depresion), but have a lot of limitation in terms of mobility (the revers gear) that realy hamper they’re performence…
The armor part can be considered noob-fiendly, but the mobility is something a player need to take in to account in every engagement.

Edit: When I say that the “T-series are well armored” I don’t mean they’re the unkillable monsters, that some people here want to portrait them as… even with the new relic buffs

The USSR has superior firepower against unarmored NATO tanks.

At the same time, even the most powerful APFSDS shells are not capable of penetrating the side of a Soviet MBT.

And the same would lilely be true if you gave Britain or France a T-80BVM. But even with perceived poorer quality players the BVM is performing well.

And the only top tier META Russia has right now is aircraft and SPAA

1 Like

Oh, this starts…
It’s not like we have russian tanks given to minor nations? Oh, well we do. So let’s see how not “poorer quality players” perform in op russian tanks



“Exceptional” results for tanks that can

2 Likes

I guess I have to repeat myself…

not to mention that the angle of attack with the M829A2 is 68 degre and on the 3BM60 is only 47 degree…

Tell me honestly, are you a bot?
image
Why did I come to the conclusion that you’re a bot? You can’t watch videos and only rate them based on previews.

Whoever proves me wrong is a bot.

Have you watched the video?

I have a suspicion that this is SadRIPer alt account… it sound very much like him…

1 Like
Spoiler

Untitled

Spoiler

Untitled_01


Are you sure you’re not a bot?

Firepower is dictated by reload and round

Most NATO nations have superior reloads as well as rounds.

Therefore Russia has the better firepower.


Can you explain your “logic” please?

1 Like

You really don’t get how bad your showcasings are huh?

1 Like