First of all, I understand that this is a video game that originated in Russia, and the game must first serve players in its own country, but due to the long-term incomplete information of the production team, we believe that a certain vehicle is like this, we need to balance the game environment and other reasons, weaken the vehicle in disguise, completely ignoring the strength and player experience of other countries’ vehicles, I don’t think this is suitable for long-term operation.
For example, the new CS/SA5 carrier surface-to-air missiles FB10-FB10A have a caliber of 160 mm, but their TNT equivalent is only 1.26 kg, which I think is extremely unfair, and at the same time, the French vehicle ito The 90M VT1 has a caliber of 165 mm but their TNT equivalent is 7.86 kg, and the 95ya6 of the Russian vehicle Modifications-Pantsir-S1 has only a caliber of 90 mm but has 8.47 kg of TNT, I don’t understand why the CS/SA5 is not enhanced? Is this for balance? I admit that this vehicle is indeed stronger than its counterparts in some ways, but in the top room environment is dominated by surface-to-air missiles, why can’t it be strengthened? There is also a radar bug of the top air defense of the Chinese system 11.0~12.0 that has not been fixed!
We Chinese players love this game but have been hurt by this unfair behavior of the production team, is this what you want to see? Do you treat us Chinese players like this?
so, no evidence, just cope? so funny
Yes… The official always rejects our submissions on this ground, which is really disappointing.
theyre right then. youre just coping
I don’t really understand what you mean?
gaijin did nothing wrong regarding such a bad bugreports.
I admit that the report I wrote was terrible, but the problem with FB10-FB10A does exist, I have limited ability to report so much…
Caliber and tnt equivalent have no direct correlation
1 Like
that’s not a problem, nothing you provided can support your statement
If the official thinks this is reasonable and the question I raised is unreasonable, then why is the data link and command wire of FB10-FB10A updated so that it is implemented? What we need is to treat each vehicle fairly, respect the scientific research achievements of other countries, instead of blindly despising the scientific research achievements of other countries, if I need to provide confidential documents to the official of this game to prove that my own remarks are correct, then I will not hesitate to refuse, because the interests of the country are greater than everything, and this vehicle is a foreign trade version of the vehicle, there are many exhibitions at the Zhuhai Air Show, and we have also provided a lot of public information, and the official just squeezed toothpaste to respond to our questions.
Got the sources for the explosive mass publicly available? Also, caliber is not direct indicator of explosive mass once again.
1 Like
What I think he means is that he has provided sources for bug reports but they get rejected.
Gaijin loves doing this by saying that certain secondary sources are not accepted, while the vehicles (the IRIS-T is a prime example) themselves are still classified.
For example, the manufacturer of the IRIS-T system as stated that the missile itself is immune to DIRCM systems found on vehicles like the Mi–28, these bug reports however get shot down for various reasons, usually cope by the technical mod that russia doesn’t rule supreme anymore with it’s SU34 anymore.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YMLQJSEdkUWO
This bug report got shot down because the user reporting mentioned something about the angle of the DIRCM on the Mi-28. The mod then closed the report as “not a bug”.
1 Like
TNT equivalent is based on the type of explosive and the explosive mass, caliber has nothing to do with it
Also, did you just copy paste your last one right after it got closed to post it again?
I don’t believe there’s any publicly available information on the FB-10’s warhead mass, so Gaijin likely based it on the HQ-10— the missile the FB-10 is derived from— and gave it the same warhead, despite the FB-10 being larger.
Vehicle characteristics are based as closely as possible to each vehicles real life counterparts (the absolute most modern vehicles do have a little bit of Developer decision due to the limited access to information).
If you have any sources that state the exact amount of explosive filler in the ammunition then you can report it. Please note that the sources have to live up to Gaijins standard and can’t just be random websites.
They also do not accept reports based on estimations, player calculations or assumptions.
You can bug report it here (just search a bit first so that you don’t report something that is already reported and known about): (Gaijin.net // Issues)
A guide on how to report bugs can be found here: ([Navigation] Technical Knowledge Base | War Thunder Wiki)
Yes, but there was a problem when editing my first post of the same type, I am not particularly good at using this forum, I don’t know how to delete my post like this, I’m very sorry.